Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,927 Results

ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 31.12.2023 passed by the 2nd respondent and the impugned order dated 25.07.2024 passed by the 1st respondent. 2. Mr. G.Nanmaran, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that all notices/communications were up...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:- “a) Issue a writ or order or direction in the nature of any writ declaring that Sub-section (4) to Section 16 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and the Karnataka Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 is illegal, ultra vires an unreasonable in law; b) Alternatively, issue a writ or order or direction in the nature of any writ declaring that the accounting of input tax credit in the books of accou...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER 1. Issue notice. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents accepts notice. 3. The petitioners has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 31.03.2023 (hereby the impugned order), whereby petitioner no. 1’s Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration was cancelled with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017. The impugned order was passed pursuant to the Show Cause Notice dated 14.03.2023 (hereafter the impugned SCN), whereby petitioner no. 1 was ca...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order of Rejection of Application for Revocation of Cancellation of GST Registration issued by the respondent dated 16.08.2024 and to direct the respondent to restore the GST Registration of the petitioner. 2. Mr.Rajnish Pathiyil, learned Senior Panel Counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. The lear...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 08.12.2023 passed by the respondent. 2. Mr.G.Nanmaran, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in the present case, since the consultant of the petitioner has failed to communicate about the impugned proc...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER These writ petitions have been filed to quash the Orders-in-Original in Form GST DRC-07 bearing reference Nos. ZD330324009770S and ZD3303240101339, both dated 02.03.2024, and to direct the respondent to pass a de novo order. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequent to the inspection conducted by the respondent at the petitioner’s premises on 03.11.2022, notices in Form GST DRC-01A were issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act. The petitioner ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) 1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Aman Mir for the petitioner and learned Advocate Ms. Hetvi H. Sancheti for the respondent no. 2. 2. Though served no one appears for the respondent no. 1 and 3. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned Advocate Ms. Sancheti waives service of notice of Rule for respondent no. 2. 3. Having regard to the controversy involved which is in a narrow compass, with the consent of learned advocates for the respective pa...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

S.M. ENTERPRISES vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Sep 12, 2024)

ORDER 1. The present writ petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, assails the actions of the respondent authorities with regard to detention of the goods and vehicle of the petitioner as well as subsequent orders passed under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the "CGST Act") read with Section 20 of Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 2. At the outset, counsel appearing on behalf of the pet...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the Show Cause Notice dated 17.11.2022 (hereafter the impugned SCN) whereby the petitioner was called upon to show cause as to why its Goods and Services Tax (GST) Registration not be cancelled. The petitioner also impugns the order of cancellation dated 25.11.2022 (hereafter the impugned cancellation order) whereby the petitioner’s GST registration was cancelled with retrospective effect...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition praying that the order dated 10.06.2022 (hereinafter the impugned order), whereby the petitioner’s GST registration was cancelled with retrospective effect from 11.09.2017 be modified to the limited extent that the same be made operative from March, 2022. 2. The petitioner was registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the CGST Act)/ the Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)