Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,927 Results

ORDER PER IA No. 249406/2023: 1. We have heard learned senior counsel for the petitioners and learned senior counsel for the respondent-State and others on the application filed by the petitioners herein. 2. During the course of submissions, learned senior counsel for the respondent-State submitted that three bank accounts are the subject matter of this application: the attachment in respect of the First Account (Account No.18961900005060) lapsed on 03.03.2024. That in fact there ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) The petitioner is concerned with the with holding of an amount of refund, which was already granted by Annexure-P/15. The petitioner was a registered dealer under the Value Added Tax Act (for brevity, VAT Act) and then the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for brevity, CGST Act). 2. On 01.07.2017, when the GST regime was introduced, the petitioner sought transitional credit of the input tax available under the VAT Act. Unde...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order issued by the respondent in Reference No.ZD330423141553R, dated 28.04.2023 for the assessment year 2019-2020. 2. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is running a Mobile shop under the name and style of 'Aishwarya Mobiles' and filed GSTR-3B returns for the assessment year 2019-2020 to the respondent. Upon verification, the respondent found that the petitioner had av...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The writ petition is filed challenging the impugned proceedings of the respondent bearing Ref.No.ZD331223243511Z dated 28.12.2023, for the Assessment year 2017-2018. 2. The impugned order is challenged on the premise that, (a) the impugned order traverses beyond the show cause notice; and (b) the impugned order has made without taking into account the submissions made during the course of investigation and the payments made already. (c) Perusal of the impugned order ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER (HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO) Heard Sri J.N. Venkata Suresh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned G.P. for Commercial Tax for the respondents. 2. The petitioner had suffered an order of assessment, under the A.P. Goods and Services Tax, 2017 (for short GST Act), issued by the 2nd respondent dated 13.01.2023. Under this order of assessment, the petitioner was declared to be liable to pay Rs. 2,84,10,044/-. 3. The 2nd responde...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) Heard Ms. N. Hawelia, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and Mr. B. Gogoi, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the Finance and Taxation Department of the Government of Assam. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the Order-in-Original dated 12.08.2024 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Dhubri Zone in respect to the Financial Year April 2023 - March 2024 whereby the authority concerned a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Heard Mr. Amit Saxena, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Nishant Mishra, Mr. Yashonidhi Shukla and Ms. Vedika Nath, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Sudarshan Singh, counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 and Mr. Parv Agarwal, counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 4. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not adjusting the ITC appeari...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ARPIT AGARWAL vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER


(Allahabad High Court | Sep 18, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :- "(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 28.04.2024 issued by the respondent no.2 [Annexure No.9] as well notices dated 16.12.2023/19.12.2023, 23.04.2024 [Annexure Nos.5 & 6] to the writ petition and the corresponding tax liability includ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the order dated 24.12.2023 (hereafter the impugned order) passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the CGST Act) and the State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the SGST Act). The impugned order was passed pursuant to the Show Cause Notice dated 22.09.2023 (hereafter the impugned SCN) alleging that the petitioner had wrongfully availed Input T...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, praying for a direction upon the respondents to allow the petitioner to rectify GSTR-1, for the months of October, 2022 and November, 2022 in respect of five export invoices. 2. It is the petitioner’s case that the petitioner is engaged in the business as supplier of minerals and other allied products and in usual course had exported such minerals and other allied products to other countries. 3. In the instant case, five s...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


27
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)