Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,969 Results

ORDER 1. This petition is directed against order dated 19.04.2024 passed under Section 73 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short 'the Act') wherein a demand of Rs. 1,44,270/- has been raised in the name of Ashok Kumar. 2. The petitioner Sushil Kumar Kesarwani, son of deceased Ashok Kumar has filed the petition inter alia with the submissions that Ashok Kumar had died on 15.05.2019 and on account of his death, the GST registration of the proprietorship firm M/s Sush...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JAI OPTICAL vs. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & OTHERS


(Delhi High Court | Apr 25, 2025)

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner-M/s Jai Optical under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, assailing the impugned order dated 8th January 2025 (hereinafter, ‘impugned order’) and impugned show cause notices dated 24th September 2023 and 30th May 2024. 3. The Petitioner has challenged the repeated issuance of show cause notices by the Delhi G...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GMT GARMENTS vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Delhi High Court | Apr 25, 2025)

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner-M/s GMT Garments under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, challenging the validity of Notification Nos. 09/2023-Central Tax dated 31th March 2023 and 56/2023-Central Tax dated 28th December 2023. This Court has had the opportunity to consider a large number of similar matters where such a challenge has been raised. In W.P.(...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner inter alia challenging the Orders-in-Original dated 14th January, 2025 and 3rd February, 2025 (hereinafter, ‘the impugned orders’) issued by the Office of the Commissioner, Central Tax, Delhi. 3. The allegation of the Petitioner is that the written submissions filed by the Petitioner have not been considered by the Respondent No. 1 an...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Heard Mr. R S Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned Standing Counsel, CGST for all the respondents. 2. The petitioner is an Assessee registered under the provisions of the Assam Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 bearing registration No. 18AAPFB1211R1Z5 and due to non-filing of GST returns for a continuous period of six months, the petitioner was issued with show cause notice dated 27.08.2020. Thereafter, the GST registration of the petitioner w...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M.N. GHOSH & SONS vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER & OTHERS


(Jharkhand High Court | Apr 25, 2025)

JUDGMENT PER DEEPAK ROSHAN, J. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying for the following reliefs: “(i) Certiorari for quashing of appellate order dated 23.11.2023 (Ann-9/ Pg. 51) passed by Joint Commissioner (Appeals), CGST & CX (Respondent No. 3) whereby appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed on ground of it being time barred. (ii) Certiorari for quashing of order dated 8.7.2022 (Ann-3/Pg. 29) passed by Superintendent, CG...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

T. SELVAM vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER-4, TRICHY.


(Madras High Court | Apr 24, 2025)

ORDER This Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned assessment order dated 20.09.2024, passed by the respondent under Section 74 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, for the assessment year 2022–2023. 2. With the consent of both sides, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned assessment order dated 20.09.2024 has been passed based on mismatches in...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER: JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA 01. The petitioner has filed the present petition being aggrieved by an order dated 29.05.2023 passed by the Superintendent Officer (respondent No.5), an order dated 03.08.2023 passed by Deputy Commissioner (respondent No.4), an order dated 25.04.2024 passed by Joint Commissioner (respondent No.3) and show-cause notice dated 25.07.2024 issued by Joint Commissioner (respondent No.3). The facts of the case in short are as under: 02. The petiti...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 & 2 and Mr. Gopal Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.3 to 5. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner has prayed for the following substantial reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 25...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
P.C. 1. The above Writ Petition is filed interalia challenging Notification No. 56/2023-Central Tax dated 28th December 2023 and Notification No. 56/2023-State Tax dated 16th January 2024 issued under Section 168A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) read with Section 168A of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (MGST Act). Apart from these Notifications, what is challenged are Recovery Notices, Attachment Notices and the Impugned Order dated 16th August ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


1
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S