Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

UNION OF INDIA vs. INDRA INDUSTRIES, RANIPET


(Madras High Court | Apr 9, 2025)

COMMON ORDER These OPs have been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short "the Act') challenging the respective arbitral awards. Excepting for O.P.No.128 of 2024, the other OPs have been filed by Integral Coach Factory (ICF), the respondent in the arbitration. 2. In O.P.No.128 of 2024, the petitioner therein, who was the claimant in the arbitration, was unsuccessful in the arbitration, as their claim for enforcement of the statutory varia...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Shri Harsh Vardhan Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned ACSC for the State - respondents. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed against the impugned order dated 21.09.2020 passed by the respondent no. 2 as well as the impugned order dated 12.06.2024 passed by the respondent no. 1. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and enga...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
P. C. 1. Mentioned. Taken out of turn. Rule. Respondents waive service. With the consent of parties, Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally. 2. The Petitioner has challenged the Order in Original No. Raigad/ADC/44/(SS)24-25 dated 30.08.2024 (“Impugned Order”) issued under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“CGST Act”) and relating to Financial Year 2019-2020. 3. The primary ground for challenging the Im...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT Petitioner challenges the orders of the Appellate Authority under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, the CGST Act’) for the financial years 2020-21 and 2021-22. 2. Pursuant to orders issued under Section 73 of the CGST Act for the aforementioned two financial years, petitioner preferred appeals before the respondent. However, by the impugned orders, both the appeals were dismissed after noticing the non-appearance of the petitioner. Despite grantin...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT EASWARAN S.,J. Does the scheme of CGST/SGST Act empowers the proper officer to issue a composite notice for different assessment years is the question raised before us in this intra court appeal. 2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the writ appeal are as follows: The appellant/writ petitioner was served with a show cause notice under Section 74 of the CGST/SGST Act dated 5.8.2024 proposing to initiate proceedings under Section 74 (10) of the CGST/SGST Act...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KAPIL KUMAR KHATTAR vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Apr 8, 2025)

JUDGMENT Sanjeev Kumar “J” 1. This review petition by M/s Kapil Kumar Khattar through its Partner Sunil Khattar seeks review of our judgment dated 3rd November, 2023 passed in WP(C) No.1379/2021 titled M/s Kapil Kumar Khattar v. Union of India and others. 2. Before we advert to the grounds for review urged by the learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner, we deem it necessary to give few background facts leading to the filing of this review petition. 3. V...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. On 11.12.2024, while issuing notice we have recorded the following position. “1. Heard Mr. A.A. Naik, Senior Advocate for the petitioner. 2. The petition questions the notice dated 24.7.2024 (Page 120), by which the petitioner has been asked to pay the amount of tax as ascertained upon the transaction as contemplated by the agreement of sale dated 7.1.2022 under the terms of which the petitioner has been appointed as a developer by the owner, to develop the land of Plot No.2 ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
P. C. 1. Mentioned. Taken out of turn by consent learned advocates of the parties. Heard the learned advocates for the parties. 2. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith at the request of and with consent of Parties. 3. The Writ Petition assails the Order-in-Original No.-NSK/CGST-ST/COM/049/2023-24 dated 07.03.2024 (“impugned order”) arising out of Show Cause Notice No F No V(ST)15-199/Commr. Adj/ B G Choudhary/2021-2022/1127 Nasik dated 20.04.2021, passed by Responde...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Heard Mr. R.S.Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Choudhury, learned Standing counsel, Finance and Taxation Department, Assam for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he has been carrying out his business under the name & style, “M/s Nipunjay Basumatary”. He is the sole proprietor and is an Assesee registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017/Assam Goods and Services Tax (AGST) Act, 2017...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER 1. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. 2. This Petition has been filed against the order dated 25.10.2024 (Annexure-P/1) passed by the Joint Commissioner (Appeal), State Tax, Bilaspur (CG) under Section 107 of the Chhattisgarh Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (for short “the Act 2017”) in Appeal Case No. 1047/GST/2024, Whereby, the appeal of the petitioner has been dismissed on the ground of delay. Further, challenge i...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)