Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,927 Results

O R D E R 1. Issue notice. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice. 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 13.06.2024 (hereafter the impugned order) whereby the petitioner’s GST registration was cancelled with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017. The reasons set out in the impugned order for cancelling the petitioner’s GST registration read as under:- “This has reference to show cause notice issued...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 53916/2024(directions) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed. 2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 7655/2024 & CM APPL. 31863/2024 3. With the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, the petition is taken up for final disposal. 4. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 13.04.2024 (hereafter the impugned order) passed under Section 73 of the Centr...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that an appropriate order be passed directing the respondents to grant the refund of ₹28,84,115/- as available in the electronic cash register of the proprietor of M/s Mandy Enterprises, Late Sh. Mandeep Singh Batra. 2. It is claimed that Sh. Mandeep Singh Batra was providing waste management services to various government and local authorities since the year 2014 and was carrying on his ac...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KUNDLAS LOH UDYOG vs. STATE OF H.P. & ANOTHER


(Himachal Pradesh High Court | Sep 17, 2024)

ORDER Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge The instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for grant of the following substantive relief:- “(A). A direction be issued under the Supervisory jurisdiction or under the original jurisdiction under the Constitution of India, as pleases to this Hon’ble Court, to allow the present petition of the petitioner by quashing and setting aside the “Blocked Credit Ledger” dated 16.05.2024, popped ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER (KARDAK ETE, J) Heard Dr. A. Saraf, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. T. Y. Bhutia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M. Kato, learned DSGI appearing for the respondent No.1 and Mr. M. K. Boro, learned Standing Counsel, CGST & CX/respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 4. 2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has put to challenge the vires of Section 16(4) of the GST Act, 2017 and the Order-in-Original dated 15.02.2022, passed by the Assistant Commiss...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT The petitioner in this case is a Co-operative Society. They have approached this Court challenging show cause notices issued to them under Sections 73(1) and 74(1) of the CGST / SGST Acts. It is the case of the petitioner that the principle of mutuality applies and at least till 31.12.2021 they were immune from the levy of GST on account of the application of the principle of mutuality. Reference is in this regard is also made to the judgment of this Court in Indian Medical Assoc...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HIC-ABF SPECIAL FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Kerala | Sep 13, 2024)

1. M/S HIC-ABF special foods (P) Ltd., 11/630-B Aroor Industrial development area, Project colony road, Aroor, 688534. (Hereinafter referred to as the applicant) is in the business of food products and are registered under GST Act 2017 with GSTIN 32AATFD1308H1ZO. 2. In this ruling, a reference to the provisions of the CGST Act, Rules and Notifications issued there under shall include a reference to the corresponding provisions of the KSGST Act, Rules and the Notifications issued there und...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JAI NATH RAI CONSTRUCTION vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Sep 13, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By means of present petition, the petitioner is, inter alia, praying for the following relief::- "i)"(a) To issue a suitable writ, order or direction issued in the nature of certiorari the Hon'ble Court be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 27.6.2024 passed by the respondent no. 3 in Defective Appeal No. 2425...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PRIMEONE WORKFORCE PVT. LTD. vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Sep 13, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Shri Bharat Rai Chandani, Advocate along with Shri Anupam Mishra, learned counsel for petitioner, Shri Sanjay Sarin, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent no. 1 to 4, Shri Varun Pandey, learned counsel for Union of India and perused the material available on record. 2. The petitioner in the present writ petition has challenged the order dated 08.08.2024 passed by Additional Commissioner Grade-2 (Appeal)-1, Lucknow whereby he h...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 16.12.2023 passed by the respondent under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 2. We have heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 3. The factual matrix is such that the matter is squarely covered by a coordinate Bench judgment of this Court in Mahaveer Trading Company vs. Deputy Commissioner State Ta...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


27
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)