Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,927 Results

UMAIR TRADERS vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Sep 12, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Shri Shiv Avtar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ravi Shankar Pandey, learned ACSC for the State – respondents. 2. Since the issues involved in these writ petitions are similar, therefore, the same are being decided by the common order with the consent of the parties. Writ Tax No. 749 of 2024 is taken as a leading case for deciding the controversy involved in these writ petitions. WRIT TAX No. - 7...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RIMJHIM ISPAT LIMITED vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Sep 12, 2024)

ORDER 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 05.09.2024 passed by respondent no. 3 under Section 20 of the Integrated Goods and Services Act, 2017 read with Section 129(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). 2. Shri V.K. Upadhya, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the order passed under Section 129(3) of the Act doe...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RD ENTERPRISES vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Sep 12, 2024)

ORDER 1. Heard Sri Swetashwa Agarwal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Parv Agarwal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the provisional attachment order dated May 16, 2024 passed by the respondent authorities under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act")...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Heard Mr. Rakesh Ranjan Agarwal, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Suyash Agarwal, counsel on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Aditya Bhushan Singhal, counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.2 and the learned Standing Counsel. 2. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by letter dated March 13, 2024 issued by the Superintendent (A.E.) Central Goods and Service Tax, Gautam Budh Nagar, being the respond...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER 1. The petitioner is in custody w.e.f. 18.10.2023 in connection with Crime No. DGGI/INV/GST/4059/2022GRA under Sections 132 (1) (b), 132 (1) (f) (i) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 registered with the Directorate General of GST Intelligence Regional Unit, Indore, Madhya Pradesh and filed this petition seeking regular bail. 2. Having considered the submissions made and looking to the period of incarceration and the allegations as alleged which relate to the doc...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 30.07.2024 on the premise that the petitioner's claim of Input Tax Credit has been disallowed without considering the petitioner's objection, thereby suffers from violation of principles of natural justice. 2. The petitioner is a proprietary concern carrying on business under the name and style of ''Annai Abirami Electricals'' and dealer in wholesale of electrical goods and he is regi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER: (HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO) The petitioner is engaged in the construction of roads, national highways etc. and is a registered dealer under the Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax & Central Goods and Services Tax Acts (herein referred to as G.S.T. & C.G.S.T.). As part of its activities, the petitioner had undertaken the construction and maintenance of National Highway No.16 from 580.671 km to 634.861 km (approx.54.19 km) under NHDP Phase-V on ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHRI VAISHNAVI ITERNATIONAL vs. CHANCHAL YADAV


(Delhi High Court | Sep 11, 2024)

ORDER 1. No one is present for the petitioner when the matter was called. It appears that the petitioner is seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for the alleged wilful disobedience of directions of this Court dated 13.08.2024 passed in W.P.(C) 11204/2024. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent is present on advance notice. 3. Ex facie, the present contempt petition is not maintainable. This Court vide the aforesaid order directed the respondent to consi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Mr. Sahoo, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, there was demand made by the State authority for short payment of Goods and Services Tax. His client preferred appeal. It was rejected. Being aggrieved by the appellate order, his client wants to challenge the same but there is no Tribunal functioning. His client’s prayer is actually for adjudication of challenge to appellate order, by which he is aggrieved. Therefore, his client has moved this Court. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs: "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI or such writ or order to quash the order dated 29/4/24 bearing Ref. no. ZD2904240752664 issued by the 2nd Respondent produced herewith as Annexure-N; ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari or such writ or order to quash the notice for intimation liability dated 25/5/24 bearing File No. DCCT(A)4.5/DGSTO-04/Audit/No....
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)