Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,922 Results

PATEL BEEJ BHANDAR vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER


(Allahabad High Court | Sep 11, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ravi Shankar Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing for the State-respondents. 2. By means of instant writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 27.03.2024 passed by Additional Commissioner- Grade-2, Etawah in contravention of Rule 108 of UPGST/CGST Rule. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by the impugned order dated 27.03.2024, the appeal of the petition...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER With consent, the main Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order dated 30.04.2024 passed by the respondent under Sections 61, 73 and 50 of the TNGST Act 2017 and to quash the same and consequently, to restrain the respondent from recovering the tax liability, including interest and penalty from the petitioner's bank account. 3. Mr.M.Varun Pandian, learned counsel for the...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Mr. C. Harsha Raj, learned Additional Government Pleader (Taxes), takes notice for the respondent. 2. By consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the order in Reference No.ZD3304242560010, dated 30.04.2024 passed by the respondent for the period 2018-2019. 4. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the respondent initiall...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SAMIRA ENTERPRISES vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Sep 11, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Ms. Harsh Chachra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By means of present petition, the petitioner is, inter alia, praying for the following reliefs:- "i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari and set aside the order passed by the Appellate Authority vide order no. 0151 dated 09-12-202...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DEEPAK SINGHAL vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Madhya Pradesh High Court | Sep 11, 2024)

ORDER PER: JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI Heard finally at motion stage with consent of the parties. 1. The petitioner herein has filed the present petition seeking following reliefs from this court:- “7.1 To issue a writ of Mandamus thereby quashing the entire proceedings and ancillary proceedings in pursuance to the summons issued on 11/08/2021 against the petitioner. 7.2. To issue a writ of mandamus thereby quashing the proceedings instituted against the pet...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT ( PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA ) 1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Uchit Sheth for the petitioner and learned advocate Ms. Hetvi Sancheti for the respondent. 2. By these petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the show cause notice dated 07.02.2024 under section 74 of the Central/Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short “the GST Act”) as being wholly without jurisdiction. 3. The impu...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:- “a) Issue a writ of certiorari quashing the Order OIO No 48/2022-23 GST Refund issued in FORM-GST-RFD- 06 dated 15/02/2023 passed by Respondent No. 3 vide Annexure-A to the Writ Petition. b) Direct Respondent No. 3 to process the refund claim filed by the Petitioner and sanction the same without any further delay along with interest; and c) Grant such other order or direction as deemed fit by this ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL ORDER In W.P. No. 2552/2024, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:- “a) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ or direction or order to quash Form GST DRC-01 No. ADCOM/ENF/SZ/ACCT-17/SUM-01/2023-24 dated 30.10.2023 for the period 2019-20 issued by the Respondent No.1 is enclosed as Annexure-A. b) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ or direction or order to quash impugned show cause notice dated 30.10.2023 bearing no. ADCOM/ENF/SZ/ACCT-17/SUM-01/2023...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs: "a. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ quashing the intimation u/s 73(5) dated 04/12/2023 bearing No. DCCT(IA&1)/Mys./T.No./2023-24 along with the summary form DRC 01A bearing reference no. ZD291223006984A issued by the Respondent No. 1 and enclosed as Annexure B1. b. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ quashing the show cause notice u/s 73(1) dated 13/12/2023 bearing...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SUREKHA W/O SANJAY SETH vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Supreme Court | Sep 10, 2024)

ORDER PER 1. Leave granted. 2. We have heard learned senior counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent-State. 3. The sum and substance of the prosecution case is that the appellant being the director in connivance with the others is involved in forging the documents for the purpose of getting statutory benefits with respect to customs duty and GST liability. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that despite letters written by the appellant indicating h...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)