^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

LAXMI TELECOM vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

ARUN BHANSALI
VIKAS BUDHWAR

Pet. Counsel

Ajay Kumar Yadav

Vijay Maurya

Res. Counsel

C.s.c.

Manoj Kumar Kushwaha

Petitioner / Applicant	LAXMI TELECOM
Respondent	STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Dec 4, 2024
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 2160 of 2024
Citation	2024(12) TAXREPLY 11864
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER 1. This writ petition is directed against the show cause notice dated 30.05.2024 and the order dated 27.08.2024 passed by respondent no.2, whereby a demand to the tune of Rs.7,41,218/- has been created against the petitioner. 2. The petitioner was issued a show cause notice dated 06.04.2024 intimating discrepancies in the return after scrutiny. The petitioner filed his response, inter-alia, pointing out that the discrepancies pointed out between the ITC claimed in GSTR-3B and ITC declared in GSTR-2A/2B was not Rs.7,70,871.20 but the same was only Rs.74,668.61. Along with the reply, requisites were filed by the petitioner. However, the authority, after consideration of the reply, issued notice dated 30.05.2024, inter-alia, indicating that as the response filed by the petitioner was not clear, notice under Section 73(1) be issued. In response to the said notice, petitioner again reiterated the same aspect along with certain more documents. Based on the said sub....