Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,927 Results

ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings of the respondent dated 29.11.2023. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader accepting notice for the respondent. 3. The petitioner is engaged in manufacturing business and is registered under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. The respondent initiated proceedings under Section 74 of the Act on the ground that the petitioner filed the returns belate...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HRC INTERNATIONAL vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Delhi High Court | Sep 19, 2024)

VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that directions be issued to the respondents to cancel the petitioner’s GST registration with effect from 30.04.2022. The petitioner also impugns an order dated 28.06.2022 (hereafter the impugned cancellation order) whereby the petitioner’s GST registration was cancelled with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017. 2. The petitioner was registered under the Central Goods and Service...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J.(Oral) 1. Issue notice. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents accepts notice. 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 31.08.2024 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the adjudicating authority under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the CGST Act)/ Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the DGST Act) confirming a demand of ₹1,06,52,96,461/- including interest and pe...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 02.06.2022 (hereafter the impugned order) whereby the petitioner’s GST registration was cancelled with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017. The impugned order was issued pursuant to a Show Cause Notice dated 03.09.2021 (hereafter the SCN), whereby the petitioner was called upon to show cause why its GST registration not be cancelled. The only reason set out in the SCN for proposing to ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the order-in-appeal dated 22.01.2024 (hereafter the impugned order), whereby the order-in-original dated 30.12.2022 passed by the adjudicating authority has been aside. 2. The petitioner is registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the CGST Act) and has been assigned the Goods and Services Tax Identification Number (GSTIN) – 07AAHCK9263H1Z6. 3. The p...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. Issue notice. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice. 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under:- “a) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction to cancel the GST registration of the petitioner on the request of the petitioner by applying an application reference number AA070724005437A dated 03.07.2024;” 4. The petitioner had filed an application dated 03....
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 12.7.2024 passed by the first respondent dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appeal was filed even beyond the condonable period of limitation and that there is no provision in the Tamil Nadu Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 to condone the delay and entertain the appeal. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader accepting notice for the respondents. 3. The ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT Heard, the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the Petitioners in the instant batch of writ petitions. I have also heard Mr. S. C. Keyal, and Dr. B. N. Gogoi, the learned Standing counsels appearing on behalf of the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) and Mr. B. Gogoi, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the Finance and Taxation Department of the Government of Assam (SGST) PREFACE : 2. In the instant batch of writ petitions, the Petitioners herein hav...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By the impugned order dated 08.12.2023, the Additional Commissioner CGST (Appeals), Lucknow has rejected the appeal of the petitioner on the ground that the same is filed beyond the period of limitation. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the appeal was filed by the petitioner on 16.08.2023, which was beyond the period of three months from the date of receipt of the copy of the ord...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RINKUMONI BORDOLOI vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Gauhati High Court | Sep 19, 2024)

ORDER PER Heard Mr. RS Mishra, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Ms. K Phukan, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Union of India, Mr. SC Keyal, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the CGST and Mr. B Gogoi, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Finance and Taxation Department, Government of Assam. 2. The petitioner herein has assailed the order-in-original dated 04.05.2024 passed under Section 73 (9) of the Central Goods and Services Tax A...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)