Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,922 Results

P.C. : 1. This petition has been filed challenging an order-in-appeal No. SK/150/Appeals-II/ME/2024-25 dated 5th July 20204. 2. The only ground on which the order-in-appeal dated 5th July 2024 dismissing petitioner’s appeal was passed is that petitioner has not provided any acceptable evidence to prove that date of communication of order-in-original dated 26th December 2023 impugned in the said appeal was 29th December 2023 and hence the appeal was considered to have been filed ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. The present writ petition preferred by the petitioner assails the show cause notice dated 03.08.2024 issued to the petitioner under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the CGST Act’). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the tenor of the show cause notice itself reflects that the respondents have already taken a decision and virtually held the petitioner to be guilty of having...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) 1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Uchit N. Sheth for the petitioners and learned advocate Mr. Utkarsh Sharma for the respondent nos. 2 and 3. 2. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “A. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to declare that Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules as amended by Notification No. 54/2018- Central Tax dated 9.10.201...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER ( PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA ) 1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Uchit N. Sheth for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr. Siddharth Dave for the respondents. 2. Having regard to the controversy involved which is a narrow compass, with the consent of the learned advocate for the respective parties, the matter is taken up for hearing. 3. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Mr. Siddharth Dave waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respond...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order passed by the respondent dated 11.10.2023, insofar as it levies penalty under Section 122(2)(b) of the CGST Act. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a Local Authority and falls within the definition of “Local Authority” as provided in Clause (69) of Section 2 of CGST Act. With a view to discharge its functions, the petitioner has engaged certain contracto...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Considering the limited issue involved in this writ petition, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing on consent given by either side. 2.This writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 09.11.2023 on the ground that the order was passed without affording an opportunity and in violation of principles of natural justice. 3.Heard Mr.P.Vikramkumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.G.Nanmaran, learned Special ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the proceedings of the respondent dated 25.4.2024 passed under Section 73 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 2017. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader accepting notice for the respondent. 3. The case of the petitioner is that during the last week of August 2024, the petitioner received a call from the office of the respondent directing the petitioner t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned proceedings of the respondent dated 30.12.2023 and the consequential order passed under Section 73 of GST Act dated 30.12.2023. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Pleader (Tax) for the respondent. 3. The case of the petitioner is that they are registered dealers, who were diligently filing their tax returns and paying taxes and were also availing Input Tax Credit. 4. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record. 2. Challenging, inter alia, the order passed under Section 129 (3) of the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”) dated 4th September, 2024, the present writ petition has been filed. 3. Mr. Bag, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners would submit that there is extreme urgency for getting the goods, which had been intercepted and detained on 10th August, 2024 released....
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BLA COKE PVT. LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Gujarat High Court | Sep 19, 2024)

JUDGMENT ( PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA ) 1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Uchit N. Sheth for the petitioner and learned advocate Ms. Hetvi H. Sancheti for the respondents. 2. Having regard to the controversy involved which is in a narrow compass with the consent of learned advocate for the respective parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing. 3. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Ms. Hetvi Sancheti waives service of notice of rule on behalf of t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)