^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

DHARMENDRA KUMAR vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

ARUN BHANSALI
VIKAS BUDHWAR

Pet. Counsel

Santosh Kumar Mishra

Res. Counsel

C.s.c.

Nimai Dass

Petitioner / Applicant	DHARMENDRA KUMAR
Respondent	STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Dec 9, 2024
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 1493 of 2024
Citation	2024(12) TAXREPLY 11818
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to make payment of GST @ 18%. 2. Submission was made that on account of change in rate of GST instead of 12%, the petitioner was entitled to payment of GST @ 18%, however, only 12% amount was paid to the petitioner. 3. When the matter came up before the Court, time was granted to the respondents to complete instructions, wherein it was indicated that the amount though is due to the petitioner, the same would be paid in the ensuing budget. 4. On 11.11.2024, time was granted to the respondents to make the payment or the Principal Secretary, Public Works Department was directed to attend the proceedings through video conferencing. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has produced instructions inter alia indicating that the difference amount of GST has been paid to the petitioner. 6. Counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute the submissions so mad....