^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

ADITI AGRI JUNCTION vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

PANKAJ BHATIA

Pet. Counsel

Utkarsh Misra

Abhishek

Res. Counsel

C.s.c.

Petitioner / Applicant	ADITI AGRI JUNCTION
Respondent	STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Dec 5, 2024
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 248 of 2024
Citation	2024(12) TAXREPLY 11875
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to challenge the order of cancellation dated 10.05.2023 as well as the order dated 06.03.2024 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed as being beyond limitation. 2. The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that on 29.03.2023, a show cause notice was sent proposing to cancellation the registration of the petitioner's firm, reason as disclosed in the said show cause notice was at Serial No.1. "Composition Taxpayer has not filed returns for three consecutive tax periods". 3. It is argued that the petitioner was called to furnish reply within seven working days and was directed to appear on 12.04.2023 at 11:00. The petitioner could not file a reply and consequent thereto an order dated 10.05.2023 came to be passed holding that registration of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled for the following reasons:- "Sectio....