Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,315 Results

The petitioner company has approached this court aggrieved by Exts.P24 and P25 assessment orders passed against it under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. In the writ petition, it is its case that the assessments have been concluded against it without taking note of the returns filed by it, which would have indicated the extent of the turn over that could have been subjected to assessment. Contrary to this, the assessments have been completed by relying on past assessments of the ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The challenge in the Writ Petition is to Ext.P6 detention notice issued to the petitioner detaining a consignment of goods, on the ground that, the validity of the E-Way Bill that accompanied the consignment of goods had expired. On a consideration of the said notice and the reasons stated therein, I find that the detention of the goods cannot be said to be unjustified. Taking note of the submission of counsel for the petitioner that he is prepared to furnish security for the release of the c....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. ROTARY CLUB OF MUMBAI NARIMAN POINT


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Dec 11, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 101 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the MGST Act. The present appeal has be....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. V.K. ENTERPRISES.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttarakhand | Dec 11, 2019)

Under Section. 100(1) of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the appellate authority for advance ruling constituted under section-99 of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. RULING 1. This is an application under Sub-Section (1) of Section 97 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as Act) and the rules made thereunder filed by M/s. V K En....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KALAGARLA SURYANARAYANA SON


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Dec 10, 2019)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub - section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by M/s Kalagarla Suryanarayana Son, (hereinafter referred to as applicant), registered under the Goods & Service....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. SRI VENKATA VIJAYA DURGA TRADERS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Dec 10, 2019)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by M/s Sri Venkata Vijaya Durga Traders (hereinafter referred to as applicant), registered under the Goods & Services ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

COMPASS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Karnataka High Court | Dec 10, 2019)

ORDER Learned counsel, Sri Jeevan J Neeralgi, accepts notice for the respondents. 2. In the instant writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: i) Issue a writ of mandamus or a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to reopen the GST common portal for filing GST Tran-01 in order to avail the eligible credit in the electronic credit ledger of petitioner. ii) Issue writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Res....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Learned counsel, Sri Jeevan J Neeralgi, accepts notice for the respondents. 2. In the instant writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:   i) Issue a writ of mandamus or a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to reopen the GST common portal of filing GST Tran-01 in order to avail the eligible credit in the electronic credit ledger of petitioner. ii) Issue writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus directing t....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
C.M. No. 10288/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 2192/2019 & C.M. No. 10289/2019 In view of the fact that the issue of jurisdiction has been sorted out on it being decided that the CGST-Delhi South Commissionerate would be the one investigating the cases against the petitioner and that the Audit Commissionerate shall not proceed in the matter any further, Mr. Bhatia states that the petitioner seeks leave to with....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This application is filed by the applicants under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for regular bail in connection with File No.SRV-KAMI-1/Ghatak-76, Bhavnagar, GST with Bharatnagar Police Station, Bhavnagar for the offence punishable under Sections 132(1) (i), 132(1)(c) and 1325(5) of the GST Act. 2. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicants submits that considering the nature of offence, the applicants may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
26
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).