^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SRI KUBERA CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. vs. STATE OF KERALA, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, COMMISSIONER OF STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SGST DEPARTMENT, STATE TAX OFFICER, KERALA STATE IT INFRASTRUCTURE LTD., MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE IT INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.
(Kerala High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR

Pet. Counsel

A.r.dileep

P.j.joe Paul

Manu Srinath

Res. Counsel

K.a.abdul Salam

Sunil V.mohammed

Petitioner / Applicant	SRI KUBERA CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.
Respondent	STATE OF KERALA, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, COMMISSIONER OF STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SGST DEPARTMENT, STATE TAX OFFICER, KERALA STATE IT INFRASTRUCTURE LTD., MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE IT INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.
Court	Kerala High Court
State	Kerala
Date	Dec 11, 2019
Order No.	WP (C). No. 33446 OF 2019 (E)
Citation	2019(12) TAXREPLY 1706
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

Related Tags :

☍

Section 62

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
The petitioner company has approached this court aggrieved by Exts.P24 and P25 assessment orders passed against it under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. In the writ petition, it is its case that the assessments have been concluded against it without taking note of the returns filed by it, which would have indicated the extent of the turn over that could have been subjected to assessment. Contrary to this, the assessments have been completed by relying on past assessments of the petitioner, thereby resulting in an exaggerated demand against the petitioner. It is further stated that, consequent to Exts.P24 and P25 orders, Ext.P27 notice has also been issued to the petitioner threatening it with coercive steps for recovery of the amounts confirmed against it by Exts.P24 and P25 assessment orders. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel for respondents Nos.8 and 9 and the learned Government Pleader for the official responden....