Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,315 Results

ORDER 1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. 2. File Number DGGI/JZU/INV/FR.H/GST/109/2019-20 was registered with the Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence, Jaipur Zonal Unit under Section 132(1) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is the proprietor of M/s Sophiera. The firm by name APN India belong to his brother. Petitioner has not committed any offe....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the release of the consignment could not be made pursuant to the order dated 13.12.2019 of this Court., which reads as follows: “Notice before admission to the respondents. The learned Government Pleader takes notice for all the respondents. Post on 16.12.2019. In the meanwhile, if the petitioner pays an amount of ₹ 60,000/- (Rupees Sixty Thousand only) towards the sum determined under Section 121(1)(b) of the CGST Act....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ROYAL TRADERS vs. THE ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER


(Kerala High Court | Dec 16, 2019)

A consignment of copra that has been transported at the instance of the petitioner was detained by the respondent. Ext.P13 is the detention notice determining the tax and penalty for the purposes of the security to be furnished by the petitioner. On a perusal of Ext.P13 notice, it is seen that the interstate transportation of the goods was being carried out by dealers who did not have a registration as mandated for interstate movement under the CGST Act. On a consideration of the reasons cont....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ABHI MOBILE HOUSE vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Dec 16, 2019)

The petitioner, a proprietorship concern, is a dealer in the business of sale and purchase of Mobile Phones. It is registered under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. Prior to the introduction of Goods and Service Tax Act, it was registered under the provisions of Punjab VAT Act as well as under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Grievance of the petitioner is that it could not upload the details of un-utilized Input Tax Credit (in short 'ITC') as per the accounts books to the ele....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for the following reliefs: a) Issue writ of mandamus directing the respondent to allow the petitioner to pay taxes on the regular electronic system also which is being maintained for use of the credit likely to be considered for the petitioner.   b) Issue writ of mandamus and it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to provide revise facility in uploading GST TRAN-1 and other returns filed....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. SIEMENS LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Dec 16, 2019)

Present for the Appellant:  Sri Kartik Kumar Gandhi, Attorney Sri Prithanu Bhattacharjee, Senior Manager (Tax) Present for the Respondent: Sri Saurav Krishna Ghosh, Joint Commissioner, State Tax, Large Taxpayer Unit 1. This Appeal has been filed by M/s. Siemens Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the Appellant”) on 17.09.2019 against Advance Ruling Order No. 18/WBAAR/2019-20 dated 19.08.2019, pronounced by the West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (hereinaf....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

UTTAR PRADESH AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | Dec 13, 2019)

PROCEEDING OF THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING UIS, 98 OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 Sub:- GST ACT, 2017 - Advance Ruling U/s 98 - liability to tax under GST Act in respect to application dated 26.09.2019 from M/S Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - Order- Reg. 1) M/s. Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad, 104 Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - 226001 (here in after called the applicant) is a registered assessee under GST having GSTN....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R Exemption from filing certified copy granted. Delay condoned. The special leave petitions are dismissed. However, in SLP Diary No. 41632 of 2019, it is open for the Union of India to apply for a review insofar as the GST aspect is concerned before the High Court of Bombay. If this is done within a period of four weeks from today, the review petition will be disposed of on merits. Application for impleadment stands dismissed. ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P8 determination order under Section 129 of the SGST Act. It is stated by the petitioner that pursuant to the determination order, the goods and the vehicle have been released pursuant to the petitioner furnishing Ext.P4 bank guarantee for the tax and penalty amounts determined under Section 129 of the SGST Act. The petitioner thereafter took time to produce before this Court Ext.P10 objection, filed before the 1st respondent, objectin....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by a detention of goods that were consigned under cover of Ext.P2 e-way bill and Ext.P1 invoice. A perusal of Ext.P3(a) detention notice and Ext.P3(d) detention order would indicate that the reason for detention was that, while the e-way bill was raised in favour of a consignee who had a GSTIN number, and was a defaulter in the filing of returns for almost 27 months, the e-way bill showed the consignment as meant for an unregistered dealer, s....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
26
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).