^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

MOHAMMED YUNUS@MOHAMMED YUNUS KHAN@MOHEMMED YUNUS@YUNUS KHAN, , S/O LATE SHRI NAJIR AHMED @ MOHEMMED NAJIR KHAN @ MOHEMMED NAJIR vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN, THROUGH PP
(Rajasthan High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

PANKAJ BHANDARI

Pet. Counsel

Sanjay Jhanwar

Res. Counsel

Siddharath Ranka

Pankaj Agarwal

Petitioner / Applicant	MOHAMMED YUNUS@MOHAMMED YUNUS KHAN@MOHEMMED YUNUS@YUNUS KHAN, , S/O LATE SHRI NAJIR AHMED @ MOHEMMED NAJIR KHAN @ MOHEMMED NAJIR
Respondent	STATE OF RAJASTHAN, THROUGH PP
Court	Rajasthan High Court
State	Rajasthan
Date	Dec 16, 2019
Order No.	S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15702/2019
Citation	2019(12) TAXREPLY 1718
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

Related Tags :

☍

Section 132

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
ORDER 1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. 2. File Number DGGI/JZU/INV/FR.H/GST/109/2019-20 was registered with the Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence, Jaipur Zonal Unit under Section 132(1) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is the proprietor of M/s Sophiera. The firm by name APN India belong to his brother. Petitioner has not committed any offence under Section 132 Sub-Clause (b) and (c) of the Act. None of the alleged fake firms or their proprietors have been interrogated by the Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence. It is also contended that no revenue loss or fake input credit have been claimed so far by any of the firms. 4. Counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on “G-Tech Industries vs. Union of India 2016(339) E.L.T. 209 (P & H)” wherein Punjab and Haryana High Court has he....