Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


1
TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option
Active Filters:
State - Rajasthan ✔

  483 Results

ORDER 1. By filing the present criminal misc. petition u/S 528 BNSS, the accused petitioner has prayed to quash and set aside the order dated 31.01.2025, passed by the Court of learned Addl. Chief Judicial magistrate (Economic Offence), Jaipur Metro-II (for short, 'the trial Court') in Criminal Misc Case No. 06/2025 (Union of India Vs. M/s. Miraj Products Limited & Anr.; to quash the non-bailable warrants in question and further to direct the learned Court concerned to accept ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Order 1. This petition was filed seeking directions for release of the goods and the vehicle seized under Sections 129 & 130 of the Rajasthan Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. Further challenge is to the penalty order dated 28.09.2019 and confiscation order dated 26.11.2019. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent on instructions submits that after payment of fine by the owner, the vehicle has been released and goods were auctioned in August, 2020. It is further submitted that the pe...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VINEET JAIN vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Rajasthan High Court | Jan 24, 2025)

ORDER 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. DGGI/INV/GST/3844/2023-Gr D-O/o ADG-DGGI-JZU-JAIPUR for the offence(s) under Section 132 (1) (C), (f) & (H), Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 2017’). 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was arrested on 28.09.202...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ANIL KUMAR TIRTHANI


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Jan 3, 2025)

Note 1: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. Note 2: At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provision...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BHAGVAN TIRTHANI


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Jan 3, 2025)

Note 1: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. Note 2: At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HINDUSTAN ZINC LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Jan 3, 2025)

Note 1: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. Note 2: At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BARMINCO INDIAN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & OTHERS


(Rajasthan High Court | Dec 3, 2024)

ORDER PER 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner against show cause notice mainly on the submission that GST is not leviable on import of services. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of various circulars and order, the petitioner is not liable to payment of GST on import of services, but the authority concerned, at the pre-show cause notice stage, has not considered this aspect and has mechanically issued show cause notice. 3. Learned counse...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS vs. GAUTAM GARG


(Rajasthan High Court | Dec 3, 2024)

ORDER PER 1. The matter comes upon for hearing on the application for cancellation of bail filed under Section 439 (2) of Cr.P.C. as the Hon’ble Apex Court in Criminal Appeal No.316/2024 (arising out of SLP (Crl) No. 10864/2024), directed this Court to provide reasonable opportunity to both the parties for advancing their arguments on the application filed under Section 439 (2) of the Cr.P.C.. The Hon’ble Apex Court also directed the counsel for the respondent to present on th...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

UMED CLUB


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Dec 2, 2024)

Note 1: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. Note 2: At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

FOREFRONT BHARAT PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Dec 2, 2024)

Note 1: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. Note 2: At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)