Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,969 Results

Order 1. This petition was filed seeking directions for release of the goods and the vehicle seized under Sections 129 & 130 of the Rajasthan Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. Further challenge is to the penalty order dated 28.09.2019 and confiscation order dated 26.11.2019. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent on instructions submits that after payment of fine by the owner, the vehicle has been released and goods were auctioned in August, 2020. It is further submitted that the pe...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER ( Per : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ) Heard Mr. Gautam Kejriwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. K.N. Singh, learned ASG assisted by Mr. Anshuman Singh, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the CGST and CX. 2. This writ application has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:- “(i) For quashing of the ex parte order dated 13.03.2024 passed by Sri. P.K. Katiyar, the Learned Principal Commissioner, Central GST and Central Excise, Patna ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 13.12.2023 passed under Section 73 of the GST Act as well as the as the order dated 30.01.2025, whereby, the appeal has been dismissed as being beyond limitation. 3. Submission of the Counsel for the petitioner is that the order dated 13.12.2023 is an ex-parte order and no notice for hearing was ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MINTELLECTUALS LLP vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Delhi High Court | Feb 13, 2025)

ORDER PER 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 8674/2025 (for exemption) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 1806/2025 & CM APPL. 8673/2025 3. The Petitioner has filed the present petition under Aricle 226 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved, inter alia, by the ex parte impugned order dated 5th August, 2024 (hereinafter “impugned order”) which arose out of the impugned Show Cause No...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Oral Order (PER : HONOURABLE Mr.  JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) 1. Heard learned advocate Mr.  Bharat Raichandani appearing for learned advocate Mr. Rithik Jain for the petitioner. 2. Learned advocate Mr.  Bharat Raichandani for the petitioner submitted that as per the affidavit-in-reply filed by the respondents which was affirmed on 28th January, 2025 all the audit paragraphs except Paragraph No.6 have been closed. It was pointed out that Paragraph No.6 refers to the n...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

P.B ENTERPRISE vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Calcutta High Court | Feb 12, 2025)

ORDER Kausik Chanda, J. The petitioner submitted a claim for the refund of unutilised input credit concerning six shipping bills. The details of these shipping bills are provided below: Sr. No. Port Name Invoice date Invoice No. Shipping bill no. Bill Value (Rs.) 01. LCSH 01-10-...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) 1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Uchit N. Sheth for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms. Shrunjal Shah for the respondents. 2. Having regard to the controversy involved which is in a narrow compass, with the consent of learned advocates for the respective parties, the matter is taken up for hearing. 3. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms. Shrunjal Shah waives servi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MEHRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Feb 12, 2025)

1. Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lie before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai as under Sub-Section (1) of Section 100 of CGST Act / TNGST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on the ruling sought to be appealed is communicated. 2. In terms of Section 103 (1) of the Act, Advance Ruling pronounced by the Authority under Chapter XVII of the Act shall be binding only- (a) on the applicant who had sought it in respect of any matter ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JUDE FOODS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Feb 12, 2025)

1. Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lie before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai as under Sub-Section (1) of Section 100 of CGST Act / TNGST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on the ruling sought to be appealed is communicated. 2. In terms of Section 103(1) of the Act, Advance Ruling pronounced by the Authority under Chapter XVII of the Act shall be binding only- (a) on the applicant who had sought it in respect of any matter r...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NELLAI MOTORS.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Feb 12, 2025)

1. Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lie before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-Section (1) of Section 100 of CGST Act 2017/ TNGST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on the ruling sought to be appealed, is communicated. 2. In terms of Section 103 (1) of the Act, Advance Ruling pronounced by the Authority under Chapter XVII of the Act shall be binding only- (a) on the applicant who had sought it in respect of any matte...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


1
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S