Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,315 Results

SANJAYBHAI LAXMANBHAI GOGARA vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Dec 17, 2019)

1. Heard Mr. D.K. Puj, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Trupesh Kathiria, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner has already paid the amount of ₹ 1,17,832/, which is more than the amount of fine in lieu of confiscation, in terms of the order of confiscation passed under section 130 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, the respondents are directed to forthwith release the conveyance bearing No. GJ10....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KUSHAL LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Dec 17, 2019)

1. By this petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the provisional attachment orders dated 18.10.2019 passed under section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “GST Acts”) provisionally attaching the bank accounts of the petitioners. The petitioners seek a further direction to the respondents to forthwith release the provisional a....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KALPANA STORES vs. THE STATE OF TRIPURA & OTHERS


(Tripura High Court | Dec 17, 2019)

Heard learned counsel for the parties for final disposal of the petition. 2. Petitioner has challenged the action of the respondents who are the tax authorities of the State of Tripura. In particular the grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner’s goods in the nature of TMT Bars which were being transported from one place within the State to another, were illegally detained by the authorities along with the transport vehicle in which the goods were being transported. The pe....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks the following reliefs: “(a) Issue a Writ of mandamus or any other Writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby declaring Rule 117 of CGST Rules providing time limit for filing TRAN-1 as ultravires, contrary and in violation to Section 140 and 17 4 of the CGST Act, 2017. (b) Issue a Writ of mandamus or any other Writ, order or directions declaring that the Petitioner is entitled to tax credit o....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks the following reliefs: “(a) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue direction to Respondents to either open the portal so as to enable the Petitioner to file the TRAN-1 forms electronically, failing which the Department shall accept the manually TRAN-1 Form which had been filed with them and even is enclosed with this Writ as there were bonafide difficulties being faced by Petitioner. The Petitioner claim be....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SRC AVIATION (P) LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


(Delhi High Court | Dec 17, 2019)

1. Despite giving an opportunity, no counter affidavit has been filed. We, therefore, close the right of the respondents to file the counter affidavits and proceed to disposed of the writ petition. 2. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks the following reliefs: “i) To issue writ of mandamus and/ or a writ in the nature of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ(s) directing the Respondent Authorities to either reopen the GST portal for one ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SONI TRADERS vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


(Delhi High Court | Dec 17, 2019)

1. Despite an opportunity, no counter affidavit has been filed. We, therefore, close the right of the respondents to file the counter affidavit and proceed to dispose of the writ petition. 2. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks the following reliefs: i. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby directing the Respondents to open the Portal to enable the Petitioner to file its claim of tax credit in....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SAWARIYA TRADERS vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Dec 17, 2019)

1. Mr. Samir Gupta, learned advocate with Mr. Monal Chaglani, learned advocate for the petitioners invited the attention of the court to the order of detention made under section 129(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'the CGST Act') and other statutes to submit that the same is totally silent as regards the discrepancy noticed after the physical verification of the goods and conveyance. Referring to the notice issued under section 130 of th....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner in W.P.(C) 32848/2019 is the appellant herein, challenging the judgment of the Single Judge, dated 4th December, 2019. The respondents herein are the respondents in the writ petition. 2. Ext.P5 order of detention of transport, issued under Section 129(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2019('CGST Act', for short) as well as Ext.P7 notice issued under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act, were under challenge in the writ petition. The reason for detention mentio....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
As the issue involved in all these writ petitions is the same, they are taken up together for consideration and disposed by this common judgment. 2. The petitioners in all these Writ Petitions are persons who have been served with notices under Section 74 read with Section 122 (1) of the Central Goods and Service Tax/ State Goods and Service Tax (CGST/SGST) Act proposing the demand of a tax/penalty from estimated turnover for the assessment years 2017-2018 and 2018-2019. In the Writ Petit....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
25
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).