Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,315 Results

As the Appellate Tribunal under the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 has not been constituted as yet, therefore, writ petitions are being entertained against the order of First Appellate Court under the said Act, however, in this case the Court finds that the writ petition is not accompanied by the deposits envisaged under Section 112(8)(a) and (b) of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, therefore, it can not be entertained as of now. The learned counsel for the petitioner seek....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HK AUTO WORLD PRIVATE LIMITED. vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Dec 18, 2019)

01. In the instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: i. to allow this writ petition by issuing a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No. 2 to extend the time for filling GST TRAN-1 for the further period of two weeks or accept the GST TRAN manually. ii. Any other Writ, order or direction which this court may deem fit and proper also be issued in favour of the Petitioner and against the Respondents. 02. On consideration of the matter, this Court i....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DEVRAJBHAI VIKRAMBHAI SAMBAD vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Dec 18, 2019)

1. Mr. Vijay Patel, learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the amount computed by the respondents towards fine in lieu of confiscation of conveyance, subject to the final order that may be passed by the respondents under section 130 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The learned advocate has, accordingly, urged that the conveya....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DISPOSAFE HEALTH AND LIFE CARE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Dec 18, 2019)

The petitioner, a Private Limited Company, is engaged in business of manufacturing of Medical Devices. It is registered under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. Prior to the introduction of Goods and Service Tax Act, the petitioner was registered under the provisions of Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003, Central Sales Tax Act,1956 and Central Excise with the provisions of Finance Act, 1994 read with Service Tax Rules,1994. Grievance of the petitioner is that it could not upload the deta....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL ORDER 1. This application is filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for regular bail in connection with FIR registered as C.R. No.II-92/2019 with Mansa Police Station, District Gandhinagar for the offence punishable under Sections 174 and 175 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 132(1)(b) of the GST Act. 2. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of offence, the applicant may be enla....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Company and learned counsel for the CGST & Central Excise. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the letter dated 26.04.2019, issued by the respondent No.2, as contained in Annexure-7 to the writ application, whereby the petitioner Company has been saddled with the liability to pay the short paid IGST, amounting to ₹ 41,98,642/-, along with due interest within a period of one week, failing which, appropriate action under the Provisions ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. The present Report dated 24.04.2019 and subsequent Reports dated 07.06.2019 and 19.06.2019 have been received from the Applicant No. 7 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Applicant No. 1 had booked a flat in the Respondent’s project “Nirala Greenshire” situated at GH-03, Sector-02, Greater Noida Wes....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SEVK RAM SAHU, (M/S. S.R.S. ENTERPRISES)


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Dec 18, 2019)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a re....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MRS MANJU DEVI, (M/S. M.D. ENTERPRISES)


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Dec 18, 2019)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a re....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VIVO MOBILE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | Dec 17, 2019)

PROCEEDING OF THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING U/S. 98 OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 Sub:- GST ACT, 2017 - Advance Ruling U/ s 98 - liability to tax under GST Act in respect to application dated 26.06.2019 from M/S Vivo Mobile India Private Limited, GB Nagar, Uttar Pradesh - Order- Reg. 1). M/s. Vivo Mobile India Private Limited, Plot No. TZ-13 A, Tech Zone, Greater Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh - 201 308 (here in after referred to as “the applicant”) i....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
25
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).