Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,315 Results

M/S EAST HOOGHLY AGRO PLANTATION PVT. LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Dec 23, 2019)

Present for the Appellant: Sri. Anjan Dasgupta, Advocate And Sri Joydeep Dutta, Consultant Present for the Respondent: Sri M K Chanda, Assistant Commissioner, CGST & CX, Singur Division l. This Appeal has been filed by M/s East Hooghly Agro Plantation Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "the Appellant") on 26.09.2019 against Advance Ruling Order No. 19/WBAAR/2019-20 dated 26.08.2019, pronounced by the West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (hereinafter refe....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. T.P. ROY CHOWDHURY & COMPANY PVT. LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Dec 23, 2019)

Present for the Appellant: Sri Amal Kanti Das, Advocate Sri Sandip Banerjee, Accountant Present for the Respondent: Sri Pandiyaraj G.V., Assistant Commissioner CGST & CX, Park Street Division 1. This Appeal has been filed by M/s. T.P. Roy Chowdhury & Company Pvt. Ltd (hereinafter referred to as “the Appellant”) on 26.09.2019 against Advance Ruling Order No. 17/WBAAR/2019-20 dated 19.08.2019, pronounced by the West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (here....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. MAHALAKSHMI STORE, SHRI CHELLASAMY NADAR DEIV..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Dec 23, 2019)

Note: Any appeal against the advance ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain pro....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. PAPAKA HERBS & SPICES PRIVATE LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Dec 23, 2019)

Note: Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lie before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Rulings, Chennai as under Sub-section (1) of CGST Act / TNGST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on the ruling sought to be appealed is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SUNCHIRIN AUTO PARTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | Dec 20, 2019)

PROCEEDING OF THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING UIS. 98 OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 Sub:- GST ACT, 2017 - Advance Ruling U/ s 98 - liability to tax under GST Act in respect to application dated 27.06.2019 of M/s. Sunchirin Auto Parts India Private Limited, Plot No. 347 G, Sector Udyog Kendra Extension-II, Ecotech-3, Greater Noida Industrial Area, Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh- 201 306- Order- Reg. 1) M/s. Sunchirin Auto Parts India Private Limited, Plot No. 347 G, Sector....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner, a Private Limited Company, is engaged in business of trading of mobiles, laptops, tablets and accessories etc.. It is registered under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. Prior to the introduction of Goods and Service Tax Act, the petitioner was registered under the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003, and other relevant statutes. Grievance of the petitioner is that it could not upload the details of un-utilized Input Tax Credit (in short 'ITC') as per the accounts ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner, a Proprietorship concern, is engaged in business of trading and manufacturing of automotive and plastic parts. It is registered under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. Prior to the introduction of Goods and Service Tax Act, the petitioner was registered under the Haryana Value Added Tax Act,2003, Central Sales Tax Act,1956 and provisions of Finance Act,1994 read with Service Tax Rules,1994. Grievance of the petitioner is that it could not upload the details of un-utiliz....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KAY ESS SURGICO vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Dec 20, 2019)

The petitioner, a Proprietorship concern, is engaged in trading of surgical goods, chemicals, medicines, drugs, medical implants etc.. It is registered under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. Prior to the introduction of Goods and Service Tax Act, the petitioner was registered under the provisions of Punjab VAT Act,2005. Grievance of the petitioner is that it could not upload the details of un-utilized Input Tax Credit (in short 'ITC') as per the accounts books to the electroni....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner in this writ petition is an assessee under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003, who migrated to the GST regime pursuant to the enactment of the Central Goods and Service Tax/ State Goods and Service Tax (CGST/SGST) Act, 2017. The petitioner, consequent to their migration to the GST regime, was entitled to carry forward the tax paid on purchase of goods during the VAT regime to the GST regime and to avail credit under the latter regime. The transition provisions, which govern t....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Learned counsel Smt.M.R.Vanaja accepts notice for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondents to permit the petitioner to file the returns in GSTR TRAN-1. 3. The issue involved herein is no more res integra in view of the order of this Court dated 19.11.2019 in W.P.No.33290/2019 and Connected Matters, whereby this Court has extended the period to file/revise the Form GST TRAN-1 by the registered persons by 31.12.2019. Hence, the petitione....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
25
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).