Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,315 Results

ARVIND KUMAR MUNKA vs. THE UNION OF INDIA


(Calcutta High Court | Dec 24, 2019)

This is an application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on behalf of the petitioner who has prayed for his enlargement on bail on any conditions. The petitioner has been arraigned as an accused along with other accused persons in connection with the Case No. C 3179 of 2019 arising out of V(12) 75/AE/CGST/GR-VII/KOL-NORTH/2019 under Sections 69 read with Section 132(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, now pending before the learned Chief Judici...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PARESH NATHALAL CHAUHAN vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Dec 24, 2019)

1. In this case, pursuant to an authorisation issued under sub-section (2) of section 67 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/- Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the GST Acts”), a search came to be conducted at the residential premises of the petitioner herein, which went on from 11.10.2019 to 18.10.2019. The manner in which the search has taken place, whereby a search for any goods liable to confiscation or any documents or books or ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. The present Report dated 14.06.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Applicant No. 1 had filed an application before the Haryana State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and submitted that he had purc...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. The present Report dated 25.06.2019 and the supplementary Report dated 07.10.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Applicant No. 1 had filed an application dated 12.10.2018 before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 and ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. S.K. AAGROTECHH


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Dec 24, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 101 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the KGST Act, 2017) At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGST Act, 2017 and KGST Act, 2017) are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. DURGA PROJECTS & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Dec 24, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 101 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the KGST Act, 2017) At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGST Act, 2017 and KGST Act, 20171 are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. INFOBASE SERVICES PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Dec 24, 2019)

Preamble A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called 'the GST Act'), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such further t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. AMBO AGRITEC PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Dec 24, 2019)

Preamble A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such furth...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SYNERGY FERTICHEM PVT. LTD vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Dec 23, 2019)

1. Since the issues raised in all the captioned writ applications are the same, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order. 2. We have been called upon to look into and interpret the provisions of Sections 129 and 130 respectively of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short "the CGST Act") amidst lot of hue and cry at the instance of the writ applicants (dealers) redressing the grievance that the authorities concerne...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. This Report dated 24.06.2019 has been received from the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that a reference was received by the DGAP from the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering on 07.01.2019 for conducting investigation under Rule 129 (1) of the above Rules against the Respondent in which it was alleged that the Respondent ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
25
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).