Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,315 Results

M/S. GUBBA COLD STORAGE PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Jan 4, 2020)

(Under Section 100(1) of the CGST/TGST Act, 2017, any person aggrieved by this order can prefer an appeal before the Telangana State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Hyderabad, within 30 days from the date of receipt of this Order) ***** 1. M/s. Gubba Cold Storage Private Limited, Flat No.25, P and T Colony, Lane Opp SBI Bank, Trimulgherry, Secunderabad, Telangana, (GSTIN No. 36AAACG7442D1ZV) have filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 re...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MEGA JEWELS PVT. LTD. vs. THE COMMISSIONER, CGST DIVISION-F


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Jan 3, 2020)

These Four appeals have been filed before the appellate authority under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, by M/s Mega Jewels Pvt. Ltd., F-57, EP1P, Sitapura Industrial area, Jaipur( Here in after also referred to as “the appellant”) against the Orders in Original (Here in after called as the “impugned orders”) passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax Division-F, Jaipur(Here in after called as the “adjudication a...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged action of the opposite parties in not reimbursing the differential tax amount arising out of change in tax regime from Value Added Tax (VAT) to Goods and Service Tax (GST) with effect from 01.07.2017. 3. Batch of writ petitions are being filed on this issue. The main issue involved in such matters is that the difficulty faced by the contractors due to change in the regime regarding wo...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DILEEP POTTERIES PVT. LTD.


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Jan 2, 2020)

These 3 appeals have been filed under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter also referred to as “the Act”) by M/s. Dileep Potteries Private Limited, Village Chirota. Post - Ajayrajpura, Via. Bagru, Jaipur, Rajasthan-303007 against the below mentioned Refund Sanction/Rejection orders (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned orders”) filed under Section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017 passed by the Deputy Commissioner. CGST D...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been filed to challenge the order dated 07.01.2019 passed under Section 130 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as, the Act of 2017). It is apart from the detention order dated 01.12.2018. The petitioner is having remedy of appeal under Section 107 of the Act of 2017 but without availing it, this writ petition has been filed. It is more so when questions of facts are involved which cannot be addressed by this Cour...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. VIPPY INDUSTRIES LTD. LTD.,


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Jan 2, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and the Madhya Pradesh Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017) 1. M/s. Vippy Industries Ltd, 28, Industrial Area AB. Road, Dewas (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant) is engaged in manufacturing and export of various soya processed food, used for human as well as animal consumption. The Applicant is having a GST registration with GSTIN 23AABCV1297N3ZY. 2. The applicant has so...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. The present Report dated 02.07.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 9 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicants No. 1 to 8 had filed applications before the Haryana State Screening Committee stating that the Respondent had resorted to profiteering in respect of supply of construction services re...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. This Report dated 03.07.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that vide his application dated 18.01.2018 submitted to the Maharastra Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 (2) of the CGST Rules, 2017, the Applicant No. 1 had alleged profiteering by the Respondent ...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GLOBAL VISION COMPANY vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CGST DIVISION-G


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Dec 27, 2019)

The subject appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 have been filed by M/s Global Vision Company, 21/59, Bhrigu Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur-302020 (hereinafter also referred to as "the appellant") against the Order-in-original No.02/GST/Ref-Prov/2017-18 dated 26.03.2018 (hereinafter referred to as "the impugned order") passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax Division-G, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as "the adjud...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Mr. S.N. Soparkar, Senior Advocate, learned counsel with Ms. Niyati Shah, learned advocate for the petitioner invited the attention of the court to the provisions of sections 5 and 6 of the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Referring to clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 6 of the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, it was pointed out that the same provides that where a proper officer under Central Goods and Services Tax Act has initiated any proceedings on a subject matter, n...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
25
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).