Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,315 Results

1. By this petition, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) Your Lordship may be pleased to admit and allow this petition; (B) Your Lordship may be pleased to issue writ of certiorari, or any other writ or order or directions and be further pleased to quash and set aside the impugned order/s dtd.4.12.2019 passed by Resp.no.2 (Annex.A); (C) Your Lordship may be pleased to stay impugned order dtd.4.12....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this Writ Application, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: "(A) Your Lordship may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction inter alia quashing and setting aside the warrant of authorisation issued under Section 67(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, seizure conducted by the respondents pursuant to search operation initiated on 29.07.2019 and subsequent proceedings / enquir...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Sri Rahul Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner in this petition as well as Sri Nishant Mishra, Ms. Deksha Rastogi, Ms. Pooja Talwar, Sri Murari Mohan Rai, Sri Krishna Agarwal, Sri Subham Agarwal and Sri Praveen Kumar, learned counsels for the petitioners in other connected writ petitions. Sri Krishna Ji Shukla and Sri Anant Kumar Tiwari, learned counsels for Union of India and Sri Bipin Kumar Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for State of U.P. are present. In this bunch of wri...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MEGHMANI ORGANICS LTD. vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 8, 2020)

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr.Soaham Joshi, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of respondents. 2. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following relief(s):- “ 18(A) That Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of prohibition or any other appropriate writ, direction or order, completely and permanently prohibiting the respondents, their servants ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICAL LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttarakhand | Jan 8, 2020)

Note : Under Section 100(1) of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the appellate authority for advance ruling constituted under section- 99 of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. RULING 1. This is an application under Sub-Section (1) of Section 97 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as Act) and the rules made thereunder filed by...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioner has filed the writ petition for a mandamus to permit him to avail credit on the closing stock of input footwear available by rectifying Trans-I filed by them earlier. The petitioner has been sending representations while he has not yielded any response from the respondents. The petitioner has also send representation to the fourth respondent. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents 1 & 3 submits that the Nodal Officer is located in Nungambakkam namely, Prin...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT The petitioner herein is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office in Mumbai. It is engaged inter alia in the sale of pharmaceutical products, diagnostic kits etc. and it is registered under the Goods and Services Tax Act in the State of Kerala. It is the case of the petitioner in the writ petition that as per the business model operated by it in the State of Kerala, it places its diagnostic instruments at the premises of unrelated hospita...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. The present Report dated 28.06.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that vide his application dated 04.09.2018 filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017, the Applicant No. 1 had alleged profiteering by the Respondent in re...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SLN TECH-FABS (BENGALURU) PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Jan 7, 2020)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 9814) OF THE CGST TAX ACT, 2017 & UNDER 98(4) OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 1. M/s. SLN Tech-Fabs(Bengaluru) Pvt. Ltd., (called as the ‘Applicant’ hereinafter), # 46/6, Chikkagonarahatti, Magadi Main Road Lakshmipura Post, Bengaluru - 562 123, Karnataka, having GSTIN number 29AAPCS5566H1ZM, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act,2017 & KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, in form GST ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. HACH DHR INDIA PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Jan 7, 2020)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CGST TAX ACT, 2017 & UNDER 98(4) OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 1. M/s. HACH DHR India Pvt. Ltd., (called as the ‘Applicant’ hereinafter)s # 31/2, Adakamaranahalli Village, Dasanapura Hobli Makali, Bengaluru - 562 123, Karnataka, having GSTIN number 29AAICS7358G1ZT, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act,2017 & KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, in form GST ARA-01 discha...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
24
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).