Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,315 Results

LAXMI TRADERS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | Jan 6, 2020)

PROCEEDING OF THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING U/S. 98 OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 Sub:- GST ACT, 2017 - Advance Ruling U/ s 98 - liability to tax under GST Act in respect to application dated 13.09.2019 of M/s. Laxmi Traders (Pramod Kumar), C-9, Industrial Area, Sikandrabad, Bulandshahar, Uttar Pradesh - Order- Reg. 1) M/s. Laxmi Traders (Pramod Kumar), C-9, Industrial Area, Sikandrabad, Bulandshahar, Uttar Pradesh (here in after called the applicant) is a registered asse...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioners are registered as assessees under the provisions of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (in short 'CGST Act'). The petitioners have admittedly filed Returns of income belatedly for the period 2017-18. Communications dated 07.05.2019 (in W.P.No.23360 of 2019) and 15.05.2019 (in W.P.No.23361 of 2019) computing the delay in filing of Returns and consequently the interest to be remitted on the tax accompanying the Returns were issued by the 2nd respondent in th...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Petitioner’s truck was evidently transporting the building material in form of iron rods, which was apprehended by the Commercial Tax Department, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar. The petitioner was not able to show the relevant papers, and therefore, a tax, including a penalty of ₹ 2,52,810/- (Rupees Two Lakh Fifty Two Thousand Eight Hundred Ten Only) has been imposed on the petitioner and the truck has also been seized. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon sub-s...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER i. Ramesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri. T.K. Vedamurthy, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents. The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally. 2. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia has assailed the validity of the order dated 19.09.2019 passed by respondent No.2, by which the goods have been released subject to levy of tax and penalty by an order subsequ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER The petitioner has challenged an attachment of bank account by the Additional Director General of Goods and Service Tax Intelligence in Form GST Doc.22 in terms of Rule 159(1) of the of the Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 ('GST Rules') in W.P.No.13281 of 2019. 2. The attachment of the petitioners' account in the State Bank of India, Electronic City, Branch Bangalore, was on the ground that proceedings had been launched against it in terms of Section 67(2) of...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER ( Per : Honourable The Chief Justice ) Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): “For issuance of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order/direction declaring/holding Article 279-A (5) and explanation to Article 246-A(2) of the Constitution of India to be unconstitutional and ultra vires as by the same a wholly unwarranted separate provision for levying Goods and Services Tax, hereinafter referred to as “GST”, upon petroleum crude, hi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S AVH CORPORATION vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 6, 2020)

ORDER ( Per : Honourable Mr. Justice J. B. Pardiwala ) 1. Since the issues raised in all the Writ Applications are the same, they were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. For the sake of convenience, the Special Civil Application No.21615 of 2019 is treated as the lead matter. 3. By this Writ Application, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) To admit and allow th...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. KULDEEP SINGH BUTOLA


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttarakhand | Jan 6, 2020)

Note : Under Section 100(1) of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the appellate authority for advance ruling constituted under section-99 of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. RULING 1. This is an application under Sub-Section (1) of Section 97 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as Act) and the rules made thereunder filed by ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. AJAY KUMAR DABRAL


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttarakhand | Jan 6, 2020)

Note : Under Section 100(1) of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the appellate authority for advance ruling constituted under section- 99 of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. RULING 1. This is an application under Sub-Section (1) of Section 97 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as Act) and the rules made thereunder filed by...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. VIDIT BUILDERS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Jan 6, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and the Madhya Pradesh Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 and MP Goods and services Act, 2017 (hereinafter also referred to CGST Act and SGST Act respectively) by M/s. Vidit Builders (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant), registered under the Goods & Services Tax. 2. The provision...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
25
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).