Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,315 Results

RAJ CHAMUNDA ROADLINES vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Dec 17, 2019)

1. Heard Mr. D.K. Puj, learned advocate for the petitioner and Ms. Maithili Mehta, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner has already paid the amount of ₹ 1,85,248/-, which is more than the amount of fine in lieu of confiscation in terms of the order of confiscation passed under section 130 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, the respondents are directed to forthwith release the conveyance bearing No. GJ-01-....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R The petitioner has sought for the following reliefs: a) Issue necessary writ(s), direction(s) and/or pass necessary orders directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to claim refund of input tax credit by directing the respondent No.3 to accept the application for refund of input tax credit under the category “Others” either on the online portal or manually for the relevant period “July 2017, August 2017, October 2017” and other relevant period....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R The petitioner has challenged the letter/order dated 29.03.2019 issued by respondent No.5 as well as the endorsement dated 04.07.2019 issued by respondent No.8 and the letter/order dated 16.08.2019 issued by respondent No.7 insofar as the petitioner is concerned, inter alia seeking a direction to the respondents to reopen the GST Common Portal to avail the eligible credit in the electronic credit ledger of the petitioner and permit the petitioner to insert/fill Part-7B of Table ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R The petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondents to open the GST Common Portal thereby allowing the petitioner to submit Form GST TRAN-2 or direct the respondents to accept the Form GST TRAN-2 already filed manually vide letter dated 22.10.2019 at Annexure – D and enable the petitioner to avail the benefit of transit credit in terms of Section 140(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (‘CGST Act’ for short) read with Rule 117(4)(b)(iii)....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. A Report dated 29.10 2018 was received from the above Applicant (here-in-after referred to as the DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that a reference was received by the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering under Rule 128 (2) of the above Rules from the DGAP alleging that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of reduction in the GST rate from 28% to 18% w.e.f. ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. MACRO MEDIA DIGITAL IMAGING PVT. LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Dec 17, 2019)

Present for the Appellant: Sri. Rahul Tangri, Advocate Sri. Akash Agarwal, CA Present for the Respondent: Sri. Jaydip Chanda, Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Beliaghata Charge 1. This Appeal has been filed by M/s. Macro Media Digital Imaging Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the Appellant”) on 19.09.2019 against Advance Ruling Order No. 15/WBAAR/2019-20 dated 19.08.2019, pronounced by the West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (hereinafter referred to as t....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DEEP SURESH GADECHA vs. STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.


(Gujarat High Court | Dec 16, 2019)

1. This petition is allowed. 2. The arrest of the corpus – Sureshbhai, son of Ugarchand Gadhecha, by the State Tax Officer-3, Enforcement, DIV-2, Ahmedabad, vide Arrest Memorandum No.DCST/ENF-2/ STO- 3/ARREST MEMORANDUM/2019-20/B, Dated : 06.12.2019, is held to be without authority of law and thus, illegal. The corpus needs to be set at liberty, if he is not otherwise required in any other offence. 3. The corpus – Sureshbhai, son of Ugarchand Gadhecha, who was arrested by ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

OL OF STERLING BASIC ORGANICS LTD. (IN LIQN)


(Gujarat High Court | Dec 16, 2019)

1. By way of present report, the Official Liquidator has prayed as under : “[A] The Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the Official Liquidator to obtain digital signatures of Officers of the Official Liquidator to complete the procedures of acquiring GST No. of the company in liquidation and be pleased to permit the Official Liquidator to incur expenses of obtaining digital signatures from the account of the company in liquidation maintained by the office of the Official Liq....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ASIAN CASTS AND FORGINGS PVT. LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Dec 16, 2019)

The petitioner, a Private Limited Company, is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of cycle parts. It is registered at Ludhiana under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. Prior to the introduction of Goods and Service Tax Act, the petitioner was registered under the provisions of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Punjab VAT Act. Grievance of the petitioner is that it could not upload the details of un-utilized Input Tax Credit (in short 'ITC') as per the accounts books to th....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HANS RAJ SONS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Dec 16, 2019)

The petitioner, a proprietorship concern, is a Works Contractor. It is registered under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. Prior to the introduction of Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 it was registered under the provisions of Punjab VAT Act, 2005. Grievance of the petitioner is that it could not upload the details of un-utilized Input Tax Credit (in short 'ITC') as per the accounts books to the electronically generated statutory Form “TRAN-I”, which was the requireme....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
25
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).