Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,315 Results

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, CENTRAL BOA.. vs. M/S. NESTLE INDIA LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Dec 10, 2019)

ORDER 1. The present Report dated 08.10.2018 and the supplementary Reports dated 16.01.2019, 01.02.2019, 15.03.2019, 08.05.2019 and 12.06.2019 have been received from the above Applicant (here-in-after referred to as the DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that vide his letter dated 02.04.2018 the Respondent had admitted that he had set aside an amount of ₹ 12.6 Crore on ac....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. The present Report dated 15.02.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that vide his application dated 05.04.2018 filed before the Tamil Nadu State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 (2) of the CGST Rules, 2017, the Applicant No. 1 had alleged profiteering by th....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. This report, dated 06.12.2018, has been received by this Authority from the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that an application was filed by the Applicant No. 1 before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering by the Respondent on the supply of the product, namely, “Washing Machine (Elena Aqua VX)” (here-in referred ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. SREE & CO.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Dec 9, 2019)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by M/s Sree &Co, (hereinafter referred to as applicant), registered under the Goods & Services Tax. 2. The pro....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SH. PAWAN KUMAR AND 71 OTHERS vs. M/S. S3 BUILDWELL LLP


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Dec 9, 2019)

ORDER 1. The present Report dated 04.06.2019, has been received on 10.06.2019 from the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The DGAP has reported that a reference was received from the Standing Committee on 07.01.2019 to conduct detailed investigation in respect of applications filed by the Applicants No. 1 to 38 under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 alleging profiteering in....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. SWITZ FOODS PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Dec 9, 2019)

Preamble Applicant’s representative heard: Sri Narasingh Patnaik, Authorised Representative Sri Souvik Banerjee, Authorised representative A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
At the outset, I would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 (thereinafter referred to as HPGST Act and CGST Act respectively) are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the HPGST Act would also mean a reference to the corresponding similar provisions under the CGST Act. 2. The ab....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MOHIT GUPTA vs. STATE OF U.P.


(Allahabad High Court | Dec 7, 2019)

Heard Sri Dharmendra Singhal Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Shivendra Raj Singhal, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri B.K. Singh Raghuvanshi, learned counsel for opposite party as well as perused the record. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been moved by the applicant with a prayer to modify the condition of sureties bonds of ₹ 2 Crores each for release of the applicant passed by In-charge Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut vide order dated 19.11.2019 in Case Crime No....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ASHWINI JAIN vs. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Dec 6, 2019)

Having heard the learned advocates for the parties and upon perusing the instant writ petition, it appears that the writ petitioner has approached this Court essentially seeking release of his vehicle which has been detained by the Assistant Commissioner (Mobile Squad)-3, Kanpur, on 8th November, 2019. The pleadings in the writ petition reveals that a penalty has been imposed for the purpose of release of the goods as well as the vehicle in terms of section 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goo....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The present Misc bail application under section 439 Cr.P.C. is preferred by the Accused/petitioner in the matter of Complaint Case No. IV(6)78/AE/Alwar/2019/Part-II dated 22.10.2019 registered at Central Goods and Services Tax Commissionerate, Alwar (Raj.) for the offences under Sections 132 (1)(b)(c) & (d) of the Central Goods Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act of 2017’). Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner su....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
26
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).