Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,315 Results

ORDER Having heard the learned advocates for the parties and upon perusing the instant writ petition, we find that the subject matter of challenge in the instant writ proceedings is in respect of notices dated 14/15th November, 2019 and 18th November, 2019. The two notices have been issued by the Superintendent of Central Goods and Services Tax, Division Ist, Muzaffarnagar, and the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax Division 1st, Muzaffarnagar, respectively. The ma....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
P.C. : Mr. Chavda, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that the grievance of the Petitioner in this petition arose on account of the fact that the Petitioner’s additional place of business was not reflected in the OnLine System of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (Act). This has resulted in Petitioner not being able to take transitional credit in respect of additional place of business during the period allowed under the Act. He, however, states that this ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. The present Report dated 24.04.2019, has been received on 25.04.2019 from the Applicant No. 11, i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. Vide the above report, the DGAP has reported that the Andhra Pradesh State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering had referred 09 applications to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Challenge in this writ petition is two fold. First against letter dated 26th March, 2019 issued by Additional Commissioner of State Tax. Secondly, vires of rule 117 in Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 and rule 117 in West Bengal GST Rules, 2017. Mr. Raghavan, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, in transition to GST regime there was clerical error made by his client assessee, resulting in claim of short credit on transition. Since it is by result ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MALKE PVT. LTD., SAS NAGAR, MOHALI vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Dec 5, 2019)

The petitioner, a Private Limited Company, is engaged in the business of manufacturing and sale of tractor parts. Prior to the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Act, 2017, the petitioner was registered under the Central Excise Act, 1944. Grievance is that the petitioner-Company could not upload the details of its un-utilized Input Tax Credit (in short ‘ITC’) as per the accounts books to the electronically generated statutory “TRAN-I” Form, ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The learned advocate for the petitioner has tendered draft amendment. The amendment is allowed in terms of the draft. The same shall be carried out forthwith. 2. Mr. Avinash Poddar, learned advocate for the petitioner, invited the attention of the court to the impugned show cause notice dated 19.07.2019 issued in Form GST DRC 01 under Rule 142(1) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules") to point out that the notice has been iss....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is assailing an order passed imposing penalty under Section 129(3) of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the WBGST Act, 2017”) and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act, 2017”) as per calculation under Clause (a) and (b) of sub-Section (1) of Section 129 of WBGST Act, 2017.   ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner seeking verbatim the following relief/s: “……..to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction- (a) directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to submit its TRAN-1 form on the GSTN Portal in terms of Section 140 of the CGST and APSGST Act, 2017; or (b) in the alternative permit the petitioner to submit TRAN-1 manually and to direc....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
In these group of Petitions the challenge is the inability of the Petitioners to correct / revise human errors made while filing monthly returns i.e. GSTR-1, GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B electronically filed, so also the inability to correct the mistakes in its annual returns in the form of GSTR-9C under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and the Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (MGST). It was in the aforesaid circumstances that these Petitions seek a....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P5 notice and Ext.P7 determination order under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Act, detaining the goods and vehicle belonging to the petitioner, on the ground that, a verification of the documents that accompanied the goods showed that the consignor and consignee are two different entities with different GISTINs and the transaction in question was supposedly a stock transfer. The documentation is, therefore, fou....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
26
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).