^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

U.P. BONE MILLS PRIVATE LTD (STEEL DIVISION) WORKS AND ANOTHER vs. UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

BISWANATH SOMADDER
AJAY BHANOT

Pet. Counsel

Dilip Kumar Singh

Res. Counsel

B.k.singh Raghuvanshi

Petitioner / Applicant	U.P. BONE MILLS PRIVATE LTD (STEEL DIVISION) WORKS AND ANOTHER
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Dec 6, 2019
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 1324 of 2019
Citation	2019(12) TAXREPLY 1358
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
ORDER Having heard the learned advocates for the parties and upon perusing the instant writ petition, we find that the subject matter of challenge in the instant writ proceedings is in respect of notices dated 14/15th November, 2019 and 18th November, 2019. The two notices have been issued by the Superintendent of Central Goods and Services Tax, Division Ist, Muzaffarnagar, and the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax Division 1st, Muzaffarnagar, respectively. The main grievance of the writ petitioners is that the concerned authorities have seized the goods along with the vehicle/truck illegally on the basis of the sole allegation that the driver/owner/person In-charge of the goods had not tendered any document, e-way bill, etc., even when all the valid documents were actually produced before the officer by the driver. In paragraph 12 of the writ petition, the writ petitioners have stated that they were ready to pay the excess amount after assessment. H....