Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,969 Results

The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Exts.P5 and P5(a) detention notices that have been served on him, insisting on the petitioner paying certain amounts by way of security as a condition for release of the vehicles and the goods. On a perusal of Ext. P5 and P5(a) detention notices, I find that the detention of the vehicles carrying the goods at the instance of the petitioner, was on the ground that the e-way bill covering the interstate movement of the goods had not been pro...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Mr.G.Natarajan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2.Tthe petitioner had appeared before the respondent on 29.08.2019, since in communication of even date issued by the Deputy Commissioner, he refers to the submissions put forth by the petitioner to the Officer ‘during the personal hearing’. That being said, the order of rejection dated 06.09.2019 states on the ground that the petitioner did not ap...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CM APPL. 15103/2020 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P. (C) 4205/2020 1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. 2. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondent to grant refund of ₹ 9,12,893/- claimed under Section 54 of the Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'DGST Act') for the month of August, 2019 as well as the grant of interest in accordance with Section 56 of DGST/CGST Act. 3....
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This matter is taken up for hearing through Video Conferencing mode. 2. This writ petition is filed challenging the proceedings of the first respondent dated 28.02.2020, attaching the bank account of the petitioner maintained in the second respondent Bank for realising the tax dues amounting to a sum of ₹ 83,58,962/-. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that in view of the present lock down situation due to COVID-2019, the petitioner is not in a position to run the business and th...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CM APPL. 15927/2020 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P. (C) 4409/2020 & CM APPL.15926/2020 The petition has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the letter dated 11th June, 2020 and summon dated 06th July, 2020 issued by respondent No.3 whereby the petitioner has been asked to deposit ₹ 2,69,21,228/- being alleged...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. RSL DISTILLERIES PVT. LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Jul 21, 2020)

The petitioner-Company is a dealer and duly registered under the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 as well as under the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, as also with the Haryana VAT Department. It is engaged in the business of manufacturing of Extra Neutral Alcohol (ENA), Country Liquor, IMFL, DWGS, Carbon Dioxide, sanitizer and denatured spirit. By filing the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the Provisional Attachment Order dated 10.07.2020...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CM APPL. 15732/2020 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 4368/2020 1. The petition has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing. 2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 19th September, 2019 passed by the respondent under Section 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 whereby the petitioner’s refund application has been reject...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. LAS PALMAS CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jul 20, 2020)

(Proceedings under Section 101 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the MGST Act. 2. The present appeal has bee...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicants have prayed for the following reliefs : (a) Certiorari quashing the MOV-11 (Confiscation order dated 05.11.19 (Annexure E to the writ petition); (b) Mandamus directing the respondent No.3 to forthwith release the goods and vehicle without demanding any security; (c) Pending notice, admission and final hearing of this petition, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the learne...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CM 15626/2020 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P. (C) 4338/2020 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for setting aside an order dated 20.09.2019, passed by the Assistant Commissioner Narela, GST, whereby the application moved by the petitioner for refund under Section 54 of the Central GST Act, 2017, has been rejected. 2. At the outset, Mr. Harpreet Singh, learned counsel for the respondent states that the opening pa...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


1
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S