Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,028 Results

HIND LOGISTIC vs. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jan 25, 2018)

Heard Shri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri C.B. Tripahti, learned Special Counsel for the State. The petitioner has come up before this Court with a prayer that his goods along with vehicle may be released. The penalty order has been passed on 27.12.2017 under Section 129(3) of the U.P. GST Act. The petitioner states that he has already deposited part of the amount as has been computed in the notice but there is a demand against him for penalty which is equ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PARSAN BROTHERS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Jan 25, 2018)

M/s PARSAN BROTHERS(hereinafter also referred as an applicant), having GSTIN 37AAAEFP0090P1ZV are holders of Special Warehouse License No. 14/2016, issued under Section 58 (A) of The Customs Act, 1962 for storage of duty free ship stores imported without payment of duty for supply to Indian Naval / Coast Guard ships and Ocean going merchant ships. 2. The applicant seeks Advance Ruling under Section 104 of CGST & SGST Acts' 2017for the following questions:- i. Whether they are ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

FAIRMACS SHIP STORES PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Jan 25, 2018)

M/s FAIRMACS SHIP STORES PRIVATE LIMITED (hereinafter also referred as an applicant), having GSTIN 37AAACF1406C1ZC are holders of Special Warehouse License No. 14/2016, issued under Section 58 (A) of The Customs Act, 1962 for storage of duty free ship stores imported without payment of duty for supply to Indian Naval / Coast Guard ships and Ocean going merchant ships. 2. The applicant seeks Advance Ruling under Section 104 of CGST & SGST Acts' 2017 for the following questions:- ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Sri Tarun Gulati learned counsel assisted by Sri Rohan Gupta learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Apoorva Hajela learned counsel assisted by Sri Ashok Singh learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the GST council respondent no.2 to make recommendations to the State Government to extend the time period for filing of GST Tran-1 in the case of the petitioner because his application was not entertained on the last date i.e. 27.12.2017...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard the learned counsel on either side. 2. By consent of both the parties the main Writ petition is taken up forfinal disposal. 3. The petitioner was levied with interest tax. The demand raised by the respondent was accepted by the petitioner and the same was also duly paid. However, the petitioner is still liable to pay interest thereon. Thesaid amount comes to ₹ 3,48,735/-. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he had already paid 25% of the said a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
When this Court entertained a doubt as to whether the petitioners in this writ petition can maintain a joint writ petition, the learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writ petition in so far as it relates to the second petitioner, without prejudice to the right of the second petitioner to file a fresh writ petition. 2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the permission sought by the learned counsel for the petitioners is granted. 3....
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MEENU TRADERS THRU ITS PROP. vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Allahabad High Court | Jan 24, 2018)

The instructions have been received by the learned Standing Counsel. No penalty order has been passed against the petitioner. The case of the petitioner is that it was carrying goods in the nature of Tobacco from Delhi to Rajasthan and when the goods were seized the petitioner was able to present the E-Way Bill from the State of Rajasthan. The only allegation for seizure of the goods at Ghaziabad is that the Transit Declaration Form was not there. Other than that no violation of the provi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

LOKA ISPAT PVT. LTD. vs. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jan 24, 2018)

ORDER The petitioner was carrying goods from Chhattisgarh to State of U.P. The petitioner submits that the goods were duly supported with all necessary documents including E-Way Bill No.1. The demand for E-Way Bill No.2 is not required. Learned Standing Counsel has also received instructions that no penalty order has been passed. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the goods of the petitioner along with the Vehicle No.CG15AC0258 may be released without demanding an...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Petitioner seeks release of the goods detained by the first respondent under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act as also the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act. 2. It is seen that an identical matter has been disposed of by a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.1802 of 2017, directing expeditious completion of the adjudication of the matter and permitting release of the goods detained pending adjudication, in terms of Rule 140(1) of the Kerala Goods and Services ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Application seeking permission to argue in person is allowed. Having heard the petitioner-in-person, we are not inclined to enter into the merits of the case at his instance. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


5
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
10 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-7

GSTR-7 for the m/o Apr 2025 (For TDS Deductors u/s 51 - Section 39(3)).

☑ Monthly | GSTR-8

GSTR-8 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For TCS collection by E-Commerce Operators - Section 52(4)].

11 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-1

GSTR-1 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayers) - N.No. 83/2020.

13 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o Apr 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).