Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,969 Results

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Viral K. Shah, learned advocate waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr. P. Y. Divyeshwar, learned advocate waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent no.3. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the constitutional validity of Section 13(8)(b) of the Integrated Goods Service Tax Act, 2017 (for short “the IGST Act, 2017”) and to hol...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Since these petitions are arising out of the common issue, the same were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this Common Judgment. 2. For the sake of convenience, the Special Civil Application No. 2792 of 2019 is treated as the lead matter. 3. The petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “20. The Petitioners, therefore, prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to: (a) hold that the amended Rule 8 of the CGST Rules is ultra vires Section 54...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KIRAN CHOUBEY vs. STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 OTHER (S)


(Gujarat High Court | Jul 24, 2020)

1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed in public interest, the writ applicant claiming to be a social worker and a resident of Ahmedabad has prayed for the following reliefs:- “(A) To issue a Writ of Mandamus and/or Writ of Certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, to release the conveyance/truck being truck no. MP-09-GF- 9070 on payment of fine in lieu of confiscation of conveyance as per MOV-11 on such terms and con...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KHATWANI SALES AND SERVICES LLP


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Jul 23, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and the Madhya Pradesh Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017) 1. M/s Khatwani Sales And Services LLP(hereinafter referred to as the Applicant) are authorised dealer of KIA for sales & services of vehicles in jabalpur, at 1121/2. PANDIT BHAWANI PRASAD TIWARI COLONY ward no. 32 Jabalpur Madhya Pradesh (482001). The Applicant is having a GST registration with GSTIN 23AAUFK1834E1ZE. 2.&nbs...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S CROWN TOURS AND TRAVELS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Jul 23, 2020)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/ RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/ RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. • At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions,...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. MAN STRUCTURALS (P) LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Jul 23, 2020)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/ RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/ RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. • At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions,...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Learned counsel Mr. Deepak Sinha for the petitioner, Mr. Amit Kumar Das for the C.C.L. and Mr. Ratnesh Kumar for the Union of India are present through video conferencing. The writ petition was preferred for the following reliefs : (a) For quashing and setting aside the letter being Ref. No.KTW/Rejects CPP/17-18/1054 dated 16.08.2017 including the Bill dated 16.08.2017 attached therewith (Annexure-3) issued by Project Officer, Kathara Washery (respondent no.2) whereby and whereunder t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

D.S. BROTHERS vs. M/S. DURGA MARKETING PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 23, 2020)

1. The present Report dated 18.12.2019 had been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that an application was filed by the Applicant No. 1 before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of the supply of “D...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner, who is a distributor of home appliances of various brands, has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P4 detention notice under the GST Act that was served on him while goods were being transported from Kottayam to Thiruvananthapuram at his instance. A perusal of Ext.P4 detention notice indicates that the objection of the respondent is essentially with regard to the invoices that accompanied the transportation of the goods. It was found that the tax invoices furnished, althoug...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CM APPL. 15429/2020 1. The application has been heard by way of video conferencing. 2. On the last date of hearing this Court had passed the following order:- “CM APPL. 15429/2020 The application has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing. Present application has been filed for early hearing as well as for a direction to the respondent to accept the petitioner’...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


1
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S