Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,969 Results

MANISHBHAI CHAMPAKBHAI MEHTA


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jul 30, 2020)

M/s. Manishbhai Champakbhai Mehta (Legal name) and M/s. Navpad Plastic (Trade Name), Shed No. C-60, D-61, Tirupati Estate, B/H Ambar Cinema, Saraspur, Ahmedabad, Gujarat is a proprietorship company having a GSTIN: 24APOPM7898B1ZE, filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 and Section 97 of the GGST Act, 2017 in FORM GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/- each under the CGST Act and the SGST Act. 2. M/s. Manishbhai Champakbhai Mehta, an applicant pur...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S JAY KHODIYAR AGENCY


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jul 30, 2020)

M/s. Jay Khodiyar Agency (Trade Name) is a proprietorship concern whose proprietor is Shri Piyush Jayantila Dobaria having a GSTIN: 24AJCPD002OG1Z9 filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 and Section 97 of the GGST Act, 2017 in FORM GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/- each under the CGST Act and the SGST Act. 2. The applicant is engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of “Papad” of different shapes and sizes. Papad is&n...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Vide this order above mentioned petitions would be disposed of as they involve common questions. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned Additional Solicitor General has submitted that similar writ petition, i.e. Obelisk Composite Technology LLP Vs. Union of India & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18392/2019) has been disposed of by Co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court Principal Seat at Jodhpur vide order dated 12.12.2019. Hence, present petit...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. KOTHIWALE TOBACCO TRADING COMPANY


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Jul 30, 2020)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CGST TAX ACT, 2017 & UNDER 98(4) OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 1. M/s. Kothiwale Tobacco Trading Company, # 1097, Kothiwale Building, Guruwar Peth, Nipani, Belagavi-591237, Karnataka, having GSTIN number 29AABFK8679G1ZS, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 & KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, in form GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/- each under the CGST Act and...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. PRRAGATHI STEEL CASTINGS PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Jul 30, 2020)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CGST TAX ACT, 2017 & UNDER 98(4) OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 1. M/s. Prragathi Steel Castings Pvt. Ltd., (called as the ‘Applicant’ hereinafter), # 41 & 42, Shimoga-Bhadravathi Indl. Area, Machenahalli, Nadige Post-577 222, Shimoga, Karnataka, having GSTIN number 29AAECS2436DIZ1, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act,2017 & KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, in f...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MAHADEV TRADERS vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


(Delhi High Court | Jul 30, 2020)

The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to restore the registration certificate of the petitioner in accordance with the order dated 15th June, 2020 passed by the Appellate Authority as well as to permit the petitioner to file all its pending returns without any interest or late fees. Learned counsel for petitioner states that the staff of the Tax Consultant of the petitioner inadvertently ap...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by a detention of his vehicle, which was used for carrying 445 kilograms of cardamom from Kattappana to Kumali for entrusting the goods for auction pooling at Kumali. In the Writ Petition, it is the case of the petitioner that, while the goods were being transported in the Jeep in question, on the onward journey to Kumali, the vehicle was intercepted, and after verification of the documents it was permitted to transport the goods to the aucti...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
In the instant petition, the petitioners have sought for the following reliefs: a. Set aside the impugned provisional attachment of bank account bearing No.8102000065256 of the 1st Petitioner maintained with the 2nd Respondent vide order bearing No. DGGI.F.No.Va/12/2018-19/BZU dated 28.05.2019 passed by the 1st Respondent under Section 83 of CGST Act as per Annexure-A by issuing a writ of Certiorari or any other order or writ in the nature of a Writ of Certiorari and   b. Set asi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AMIT BOTHRA, ASHOK DAGAR vs. STATE OF MP


(Madhya Pradesh High Court | Jul 27, 2020)

1. Both these petitions have arisen out of the same crime number of the same office/police station, therefore, they are heard together and are being decided by this common order. 2. These are the first applications under section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in crime no.23/2020 registered under section 132(1)(a)(i) of the Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "GST Act"), Ss. 409, 467, 471, 120-B of the IPC by the Department of Revenue Intelligence and Directorate General o...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AMIT BERIWAL vs. STATE OF ODISHA


(Orissa High Court | Jul 27, 2020)

1. The present petitioner, who is in custody, has filed the instant bail application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Case No.2 of 2019 dated 18.01.2020 of the C.T. and GST Enforcement Unit Jajpur, Jajpur Road, corresponding to 2(C) CC Case No. 9 of 2020 for commission of offences punishable under Section 132(1)(b)(c) and (l) of OGST Act, 2017. Prior to instant application, the petitioner also approached the First Additional Sessions Judge, Rourkela vide Bail Application No...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


1
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S