Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,969 Results

ANUPAMA RANA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST DIVISION-B


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Jul 31, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by Anupama Rana, (The Design Studio), T-17/C, Shanti Path Colony, Nehru Nagar, Jaipur-302016 (hereinafter also referred to as "the appellant") against the Order No.ZA9904200058531 dated 20.04.2020 (hereinafter referred to as "the impugned order") passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax Division-B, Jaipur (hereinafter  referred of as "the adjudic...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Heard Shri Naresh Chandra Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri H.P. Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos.1 and 2. 2. Heard on the question of admission. 3. Shri H.P. Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos.1 and 2 has submitted that the petitioner is challenging the constitutional validity under section 16 (2) (c) of the U.P. Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and therefore, the pet...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TALOD GRUH UDYOG


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jul 30, 2020)

BRIEF FACTS The applicant M/s. Dipakkumar Kantilal Chotai (Talod gruh Udyog) has submitted that theirs’ is a proprietorship firm and is one of the leading and highly reputed companies in the field of selling mixed flour which is used for preparing various Indian dishes; that applicant manufactures mixed flour which is used by customers for preparing different traditional Indian dishes such as Khaman, Gota, Dhokla, Handwa, Rice & Rava Idli Dhosa, Dahiwada, Dalwada, Menduwada, Bha...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHREE SAGAR STEVEDORES PVT. LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jul 30, 2020)

BRIEF FACTS The applicant M/s. Shree Sagar Stevedores Pvt. Ltd. has submitted that they are in the business of providing services in relation to transportation of goods from Magdalla Port to the General Lighterage Area (Anchoring Point of Mother Vessel) or vice versa. 2. The applicant has submitted that Entry No.18 of the Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017 inter alia exempts the Services by way of transportation of goods by inland waterways. Inland w...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SWAN LNG PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jul 30, 2020)

BRIEF FACTS The applicant M/s. Swan LNG Pvt. Ltd., has submitted that they are a private limited company incorporated in India and a subsidiary of Swan Energy Limited. They have submitted that they have entered into a Concession Agreement dated 18th October, 2017 with the Gujarat Maritime Board (‘GMB’) to, inter-alia, implement the development, construction, operation and maintenance of Liquefied Natural Gas (‘LNG’) Port with a Floating Storage and Regasification U...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

CLAD WELD TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jul 30, 2020)

BRIEF FACTS The applicant, vide their application for Advance Ruling, has submitted that they are having factory at Survey No. 428/1, Village-Nana Fofalia, Dabhol, Vadodara, Gujarat-391210 engaged in the manufacture of Wear plats & Tampering tools specially manufactured as per RDSO specifications and used by Railways as a part of Ballast Cleaning Machine and Tie Tamping Machine. 2. The applicant further submitted that M/s Trio Enterprise having GSTIN: 24AFRPS0617P1ZU has got order...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VIKRAM A SARABHAI COMMUNITY SCIENCE CENTRE


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jul 30, 2020)

BRIEF FACTS: Vikram A Sarabhai Community Science Centre was established by India’s renowned Scientist, Dr. Vikram Sarabhai in 1966 to take students, from both school and college, out of the rigid framework of textbook and encourage them to think, explore and crate. It is a pioneering community science centre, conducting innovative programmes for improving quality of science education, its popularization and building scientific temper. 2. The applicant further submitted that ther...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JAINISH ANANTKUMAR PATEL


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jul 30, 2020)

BRIEF FACTS The applicant M/s. Jainish Anantkumar Patel, who is an unregistered person in GST has submitted that he wants to carry on the trading activity of Grated Supari, Lime and Tobacco by putting them together in a transparent plastic pouch for the sake of easy carry by the customer. The applicant further states that all the items will be supplied in a single pouch, will have separate price and will be shown in the invoice as a separate bill of item and at no stage will a single pric...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHIROKI TECHNICO INDIA PVT. LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jul 30, 2020)

BRIEF FACTS The applicant M/s. Shiroki Technico India Pvt. ltd. vide their application for Advance Ruling has submitted that they are mainly engaged in the business of production and manufacture of seat devices, window regulators and other allied components necessary for functioning of seats and they sell the manufactured parts to seat makers who affix the parts into the seats and thereafter the seat is affixed to the motor vehicle; that the specific product which is the matter of classif...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. DHARMSHIL AGENCIES


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jul 30, 2020)

BRIEF FACTS The applicant M/s. Dharmshil Agencies has submitted that they have entered into an agreement with Tsudokoma Corporation, Japan to sell their machinery and against the said services, they are receiving commission income from Japan in foreign currency. 2. The applicant has submitted that earlier under Service Tax Regime, they were paying service tax of 18% under RCM for the above services categorised as ‘Business Auxilliary Services’; that after implementation of...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


1
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S