^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SHRI RAMESHWAR LAL FOODS PVT. LTD. vs. STATE OF U.P. SACHIVALAYA THRU ADDL. CHIEF SECY AND ANOTHER
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

PANKAJ KUMAR JAISWAL
KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR

Pet. Counsel

Naresh Chandra Mishra

Chandra Has Misra

Ramesh Chandra Mishra

Res. Counsel

C.s.c

Petitioner / Applicant	SHRI RAMESHWAR LAL FOODS PVT. LTD.
Respondent	STATE OF U.P. SACHIVALAYA THRU ADDL. CHIEF SECY AND ANOTHER
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Jul 31, 2020
Order No.	Misc. Bench No. - 12279 of 2020
Citation	2020(7) TAXREPLY 3195
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
1. Heard Shri Naresh Chandra Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri H.P. Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos.1 and 2. 2. Heard on the question of admission. 3. Shri H.P. Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos.1 and 2 has submitted that the petitioner is challenging the constitutional validity under section 16 (2) (c) of the U.P. Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and therefore, the petitioner has bye-passed the statutory remedy against the order dated 12.3.2020 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Bahraich as provided under Section 107 of the U.P. Goods and Services Act, 2017. 4. On due consideration of the aforesaid the writ petition is admitted for final hearing. 5. Since Shri H.P. Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondents, therefore, no further notice need be issued. 6. In view of the law la....