Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,969 Results

1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant, a company incorporated under The Companies Act, 1956 through its authorized person, has prayed for the following reliefs: “[A] Your Lordship may be pleased to admit and allow this writ petition. [B] The Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned Notice dated 03-03-2020 in FORM ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HASIMKHAN LIYAKATKHAN PATHAN vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jul 14, 2020)

1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant, a Proprietor of a Proprietary concern engaged in the business of iron and scrap, has prayed for the following reliefs: “[A] The Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the learned Respondent authorities to quash and set aside the order passed u/s. 74 in FORM GST DRC-07 on 22.05.2020 dur...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. 2. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to immediately credit the already sanctioned Central Goods and Service Tax component of the provisional refund amount and to refund the balance amount to the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner states that a provisional refund order dated 27th November, 2019 under Section 54(6) and Rule 91(2) for ₹ 3,16,76,048 (i.e. CGST ₹ 1,58,38,02...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): i. For setting aside the order dated 31.01.2020 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Patna Central Circle, Bihar, Patna in exercise of the jurisdiction conferred under Section 74(1) of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, whereby it was observed that the petitioner in his Return submitted in GSTR-3B for the month of October 2018 to March 2019 shown supply of ₹ 78594038.40 whereby as per TDS Return GSTR 2...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. P.R. MANI ELECTRONICS vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Madras High Court | Jul 13, 2020)

The validity of Rule 117 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 (the CGST Rules) is under challenge in this writ petition on the grounds that it is ultra vires Section 140 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (the CGST Act) and infringes Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution, and the Petitioner further prays that the Respondents should be directed to permit the Petitioner to file Form GST TRANS – 1 either electronically or manually to claim the transiti...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S SPICE DIGITAL LTD. vs. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jul 13, 2020)

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Jagdish Mishra learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Dinesh Varun for the respondent no. 5. The petitioner has preferred the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 26.9.2019 passed in Appeal No.17/2019 by the respondent no.3 under Section 129 (3) of the U.P. G.S.T. Act and C.G.S.T. Act, 2017/ Section 20 of the IGST Act, 2017. It is not disputed that the impugned order is appealable under...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SANGAL PAPERS LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | Jul 10, 2020)

PROCEEDING OF THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING U/S. 98 OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 Sub:- GST ACT, 2017 - Advance Ruling U/s 98 - liability to tax under GST Act in respect to application dated 02.06.2020 from M/s Sangal Papers Limited, 22Km, Meerut-Mawana Road, Mawana, Distt-Meerut, Uttar Pradesh - Order- Reg. ********** 1) M/s Sangal Papers Limited, 22Km, Meerut-Mawana Road, Mawana, Distt-Meerut, Uttar Pradesh (here in after called the applicant) is a registered assess...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

R. BABU RAMESH vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER


(Madras High Court | Jul 10, 2020)

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. By their consent, these writ petitions are taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. The petitioner challenges the impugned orders dated 02.12.2019 passed by the first respondent. During the pendency of these writ petitions, it was suggested that the first respondent can revisit his own orders. Pursuant to the said hint dropped by this...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHRI JAI PRAKASH GARG vs. M/S ADARSH THOUGHT WORKS PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 10, 2020)

1. The Present Report dated 10.12.2019, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Asti-Profiteering (DGAP), under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 in which it has been stated that an application dated 12.08.2018 was filed before the Rajasthan State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 (2) of the CGST Rules, 2017, by the Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of purchase of a fla...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CM APPLs. 14708-14709/2020 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 4103/2020 & CM APPL. 14707/2020 The petition has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the legality and validity of para 10 of the ‘Bringing the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering under Superintendence, Direction and Control of the National...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


1
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
10 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-7

GSTR-7 for the m/o Apr 2025 (For TDS Deductors u/s 51 - Section 39(3)).

☑ Monthly | GSTR-8

GSTR-8 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For TCS collection by E-Commerce Operators - Section 52(4)].

11 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-1

GSTR-1 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayers) - N.No. 83/2020.

13 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o Apr 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).