Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,949 Results

M/S CSK REALTORS LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER


(Telangana High Court | Aug 13, 2020)

1. Petitioner is a Private Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. 2. It is engaged in the business of construction and sale of flats and villas and is also an assessee on the rolls of the 1st respondent under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short 'the Act') 3. The 1st respondent issued notice intimating the discrepancies in the returns after scrutiny in Form GST ASMT-10, dt.17.12.2019 to the petitioner for the tax period 2017-18 to 2018-19 (from ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VIJAY KUMAR NAIR vs. STATE OF M.P.


(Madhya Pradesh High Court | Aug 13, 2020)

1. This is the first application under section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in crime no.23/2020 registered under section 132(1)(a)(i) of the Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as “GST Act”), Ss. 409, 467, 471, 120-B of the IPC by the Department of Revenue Intelligence and Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence Central Excise Office, District Indore (here-in-after referred to as the ‘Department’). 2. At the outset, learned Senior Counsel f...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KISHORE WADHWANI vs. STATE OF M.P.


(Madhya Pradesh High Court | Aug 13, 2020)

1. This is the first application under section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in crime no.23/2020 registered under section 132(1)(a) (i) of the Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as “GST Act”), Ss. 409, 467, 471, 120-B of the IPC by the Department of Revenue Intelligence and Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence Central Excise Office, District Indore (here-in-after referred to as the ‘Department’). 2. The learned Senior Counsel for the pet...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing. Petitioner is a partnership firm, which deals in Seeds, Food Grains etc. According to the petitioner, he purchased rejected wheat from Uttarakhand Seeds and Tarai Development Corporation Ltd. (respondent no. 1 herein) in the year 2017. It is further the case of the petitioner that respondent no. 1 wrongly deducted G.S.T., amounting to ₹ 10,23,484/- from the security deposit made by the petitioner with respondent no. 1; al...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GAURAV YADAV AND ANR. vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.


(Delhi High Court | Aug 13, 2020)

JUDGMENT : D.N.Patel, Chief Justice (Oral) Proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing. C.M.No.18834/2020 (exemption from filing Court fee) In view of the present prevailing situation, the present application is allowed. However, the applicant is directed to file the requisite Court fee within a period of 72 hours from the date of resumption of regular functioning of the Court. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) No.5222/2020 1. This pu...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. N.A. INTERNATIONAL vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


(Delhi High Court | Aug 13, 2020)

Proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing. 1. This writ petition has been preferred with the following prayers:- “(a) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the Respondents to release the IGST to the Petitioner for amount of ₹ 1,79,10,516/- along with interest; and /or. (b) Issue a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the Respondents to release to the Petitioner the amount of duty drawback of ₹ ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. AAR IMPEX vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


(Delhi High Court | Aug 13, 2020)

Proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing. 1. This writ petition has been preferred with the following prayers:- “(a) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the Respondents to release the IGST to the Petitioner for amount of ₹ 43,36,111/- along with interest; and /or. (b) Issue a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the Respondents to release the duty drawback amounting to ₹ 19,94,236/- to the P...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NITESH WADHWANI vs. STATE OF M.P.


(Madhya Pradesh High Court | Aug 13, 2020)

1. This is the first application under section 438 of the Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in crime no.23/2020 registered under section 132(1)(a)(i) of the Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as “GST Act”), Ss. 409, 467, 471, 120-B of the IPC by the Department of Revenue Intelligence and Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence Central Excise Office, District Indore (here-in-after referred to as the ‘Department’). 2. The learned S...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has approached this Court challenging Ext.P4 series of notices of detention, whereby a consignment of goods transported at the instance of the petitioner was detained by the respondent on the allegation that there was a discrepancy in the e-way bill that accompanied the transportation of the goods. On a perusal of Ext.P4 series of notice, I find that the reason for detention was that, while the consignment was supported by an invoice which contained the details of the goods tra...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This petition is filed seeking quashing of the impugned penalty order at Annexure-E bearing No. No. ACCT/ENF-2/HBL/ORD 04/2019-20 dated 25.11.2019 in Form GST OV 09 by the respondent No.1 under Section 129 (3) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 (for short ‘the Act’) and for other relief’s. 2.I have heard Sri Arvind Kamath, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned AGA for the respondents and perused the material on record. 3.In...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


30
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)