Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,949 Results

JAGDISH ARORA AND ANOTHER vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Madhya Pradesh High Court | Aug 18, 2020)

Hearing convened through video conferencing. 2. This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure [for short “the CrPC”] on behalf of the applicants, namely, Jagdish Arora and Ajay Kumar Arora, who have been taken into judicial custody in connection with Crime No.DGGI/BhZU/1204/03/2020-21/SDPL, registered at the Central Goods and Service Tax, Bhopal, in respect of the offence punishable under Section 132(1)(a) read with section 132(1)...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING vs. M/S. LITE BITE TRAVEL FOODS PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Aug 17, 2020)

1. The present Report dated 25.10.2019, received on 30.10.2019 by this Authority, has been furnished by the Applicant i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), under Rule 129(6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that a reference was received by the DGAP from the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering on 02.05.2019 recommending a detailed investigation in respect of a report dated 24.02.2019 submitted by the Joint Commissi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Exts.P1 and P2 assessment orders and Exts.P8 and P9 consequential demand notices issued him under the GST Act. In the writ petition it is the case of the petitioner that the assessments pertaining to the months April and May 2019 were completed under Section 62 of the SGST Act on best judgment basis, taking note of the non filing of returns by the petitioner assessee for the said month. While the assessment orders are dated 20.8.2019, it i...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The hearing has been conducted through Video Conferencing. Crl.M.A.No. /2020 (to be numbered) 2. Exemption allowed, subject to the condition that petitioner will file the duly sworn/attested affidavit within 72 hours from the date of resumption of the regular functioning of this Court. 3. The application stands disposed of. Crl.M.A.No. /2020 (to be numbered) 4. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 5. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 12...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that present petition is liable to be disposed of in terms of order dated 12.12.2019 passed by Co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court Principal Seat at Jodhpur in Obelisk Composite Technology LLP Vs. Union of India & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18392/2019). In this petition, petitioner has prayed that it may be permitted to file Form TRAN-1 in compliance of Section 140 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for sho...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner seeks a certiorari challenging an order of cancellation of registration under the provisions of the Central Good and Service Tax Act, 2017 dated 08.11.18. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner brings to my notice an order passed by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes, Customs in order No.1 of 2020 Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs in S.O. 2064 (E). dated 25.06.2020 to the following effect: Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
he petitioner seeks a certiorari challenging an order of cancellation of registration under the provisions of the Central Good and Service Tax Act, 2017 dated 14.11.2019. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner brings to my notice an order passed by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes, Customs in order No.1 of 2020 Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs in S.O. 2064 (E). dated 25.06.2020 to the following effect: Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioners, the Managing Director and Director of a Company registered under the Companies Act,engaged in providing Cable Services as a Multi Service Operator (MSO) under the Telephone Regulatory of India (TRAI) Regulations, are in appeal. The appellants allege that illegal proceedings were taken against them, purportedly under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ['CGST Act' for brevity], and their residences and offices were raided, both of them kept under illegal custo...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VARUN GOEL vs. M/S. ELDECO INFRASTRUCTURE & PROPERTIES LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Aug 14, 2020)

1. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 2 (here-in-after referred to as the DGAP) vide his Report dated 28.11.2018, furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CCS T) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had conducted an investigation on the complaint of the Applicant No. 1 and found that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of additional Input tax Credit (ITC) to the above Applicant as well as 124 other house and plo...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SRI G.K. EXIM vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS


(Andhra Pradesh High Court | Aug 13, 2020)

1) The present Writ Petition came to be filed seeking issuance of a writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the Respondents to reopen the portal immediately enabling the Writ Petitioner to submit its GST TRAN-1 Form in the GSTN Portal in terms of Section 140 of the CGST and APSGST Act, 2017; or in the alternative, permit the Writ Petitioner to submit GST TRAN-1 manually with a direction to the Respondents to consider the same in accordance with law. It is further pleaded that, a direction...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


30
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)