Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

VIJAY KUMAR NAIR vs. STATE OF M.P.
(Madhya Pradesh High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

VIRENDER SINGH
Pet. Counsel
Sanjay Agrawal
N. L. Tiwari
Res. Counsel
Vikramjit Banerjee
Prasanna Prasad

Petitioner / Applicant

VIJAY KUMAR NAIR
Respondent STATE OF M.P.
Court Madhya Pradesh High Court
State

Madhya Pradesh

Date Aug 13, 2020
Order No.

M.Cr.C. No.23289 of 2020

Citation

2020(8) TAXREPLY 3211
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

1. This is the first application under section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in crime no.23/2020 registered under section 132(1)(a)(i) of the Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as “GST Act”), Ss. 409, 467, 471, 120-B of the IPC by the Department of Revenue Intelligence and Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence Central Excise Office, District Indore (here-in-after referred to as the ‘Department’). 2. At the outset, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner claimed parity with co-accused-Amit Bothra and Ashok Daga, who have been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 27.07.2020 passed in M.Cr.C. Nos.21628/2020 and 21618/2020 respectively. 3. He further asserted that rather the case of the petitioner is on better footing than the case of co-accused- Amit Bothra and Ashok Daga, because all the allegations of the department of tax evasion are against their firm M/s Vishnu Essence, while the petitioner is neither a partner no....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
30
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)