Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,949 Results

1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant, a proprietary concern through its proprietor, has prayed for the following reliefs:- “a. A Writ of Certiorari or any other writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari directing the respondents to quash the notice of provisional attachment under section 83 of the Act for provisional attachment of bank Account No.37846915026 and further to direct the respondent No.3 to change the s...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SUBHASH CHANDER vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Aug 7, 2020)

1. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking grant of regular bail in respect of a case Complaint case No.COMA/46/2019, dated 18.10.2019, under Section 69/132(1)(b)(c) of the Punjab Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. 2. Reply by way of affidavit of Anita Sodhi, State Tax Officer, Mobile Wing, Patiala has been filed. The same is taken on record.   3. The allegations, in nutshell, are that the petitioner had availed Input Tax Credit (ITC) to the tune of about ₹ 10.81 crores ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAJINDER BASSI, TARUN BASSI AND MANISH PAUL vs. STATE OF PUNJAB


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Aug 7, 2020)

1. This order shall dispose of the above mentioned three petitions wherein petitioner Rajinder Bassi, Tarun Bassi and Manish Paul, have approached this Court seeking grant of regular bail in respect of a case Criminal complaint No.40/2019, dated 21.11.2019, under Section 132(1)(b)(c) of the Punjab Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. 2. Reply by way of affidavit of Arvind Sharma, State Tax Officer, Department of Punjab, State GST, Fatehgarh Sahib, Ludhiana has been filed in CRM-M-12871-2020. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Dated this the 6th day of August, 2020 The writ petition has been filed challenging Exts. P4 and P5 and seeking to declare that the provisions of Section 130 of the Kerala Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and the Central Goods and Service Tax Act as a violative of Article 19(1)(g) and Article 301 of the Constitution of India. 2. When this writ petition came up for admission, this Court passed an interim order dated 16.01.2018 to the following effects. "Having regard to the facts a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
These writ petitions were filed by the petitioner challenging the proceedings initiated against them under the Kerala Goods and Service Tax Ordinance 2017. These writ petitions were filed at a time, when the Appellate Authority was not constituted under the Ordinance/Act. 2. Today when these writ petitions came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a competent Appellate Authority has already been constituted by the respondents and petitioners may be permitt...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This writ petition seeks a certiorari challenging an order of rejection of appeal dated 31.01.2020 filed against the cancellation of registration dated 02.07.2019 under the provisions of the Central Good and Service Tax Act, 2017. 2. The Central Board of Indirect Taxes, Customs has passed an order bearing No.1 of 2020 Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs in S.O. 2064 (E). dated 25.06.2020 to the following effect: Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenu...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This intra Court appeal has been preferred by the State challenging the order passed by learned Single Judge in Writ Petition Nos.19098/2019 and 19722- 19723/2019 (T-RES). 2. We have heard Sri Vikram Huilgol, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the appellants and Sri Aravind Kamath, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Smt. Veena J. Kamath for the respondents. 3. The factual matrix of the case are that Vigilance Cell of Commercial Tax intercepted the goods co...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The controversy in the Writ Appeals and the Writ Petitions arose on the Goods and Services Tax regime coming into effect from 01.07.2017. The dealers who were covered under the earlier regime were required to upload FORM GST TRAN 1 within the time stipulated, to avail input tax credit in respect of the stock of goods held by them. 2. The two dealers filed Writ Petitions numbered as W.P. (C). Nos.9081/2018 and 9067/2018 seeking a mandamus to reopen the portal of the Department, to facilita...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER We decline to interfere in this Special Leave Petition. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed accordingly. However, it will be open to the petitioner to request the concerned authority to defer the recording of statement of the petitioner until the lockdown period is over. That request be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SEALWEL CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Aug 4, 2020)

(Under Section 100(1) of the CGST/TGST Act, 2017, any person aggrieved by this order can prefer an appeal before the Telangana State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Hyderabad, within 30 days from the date of receipt of this Order) ****** 1. M/s. Sealwel Corporation Private Limited, 345/SRT-S. R Nagar- Hyderabad – 500 038, Telangana, (GSTIN No. 36AAOCS4141F1ZB) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 o...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


30
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)