Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

NAMASKAR ENTERPRISE vs. COMMISSIONER OF GOODS AND SERVICE TAX
(Gujarat High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

VIKRAM NATH
J.B.PARDIWALA
Pet. Counsel
Hardik V Vora
Res. Counsel
Ankit Shah
Sh Almaula

Petitioner / Applicant

NAMASKAR ENTERPRISE
Respondent COMMISSIONER OF GOODS AND SERVICE TAX
Court Gujarat High Court
State

Gujrat

Date Aug 7, 2020
Order No.

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18105 of 2019

Citation

2020(8) TAXREPLY 3198
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)
Related Tags :

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant, a proprietary concern through its proprietor, has prayed for the following reliefs:- “a. A Writ of Certiorari or any other writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari directing the respondents to quash the notice of provisional attachment under section 83 of the Act for provisional attachment of bank Account No.37846915026 and further to direct the respondent No.3 to change the status of account from ‘on hold’ to ‘active’; b. Pass any other order(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and appropriate in order to grant interim relief to the petitioner; c. Any other and further relief deemed just and proper be granted in the interest of justice; d. To provide for the cost of this petition.” 2. We need not delve much into the facts of this litigation as the controversy is in a very narrow compass. The subject matter of cha....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
30
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)