Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

SUBHASH CHANDER vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
(Punjab and Haryana High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Pet. Counsel
Ankur Mittal
Res. Counsel
Lalit Singla

Petitioner / Applicant

SUBHASH CHANDER
Respondent STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
Court Punjab and Haryana High Court
State

Punjab

Date Aug 7, 2020
Order No.

CRM-M-19551-2020 (O&M)

Citation

2020(8) TAXREPLY 3185
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

1. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking grant of regular bail in respect of a case Complaint case No.COMA/46/2019, dated 18.10.2019, under Section 69/132(1)(b)(c) of the Punjab Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. 2. Reply by way of affidavit of Anita Sodhi, State Tax Officer, Mobile Wing, Patiala has been filed. The same is taken on record.   3. The allegations, in nutshell, are that the petitioner had availed Input Tax Credit (ITC) to the tune of about ₹ 10.81 crores on the basis of invoices without there being actual sale of goods. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the vires of the Act i.e. Punjab Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 has itself been challenged in CWP No.8004-2020 wherein notice of motion has been issued by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court and which presently stands fixed for 23.9.2020. 5. The aforestated position regarding challenge of vires is not disputed by the learned State counsel. 6. On the ....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
30
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)