Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

NITESH WADHWANI vs. STATE OF M.P.
(Madhya Pradesh High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

VIRENDER SINGH
Pet. Counsel
Vikas Singh
J. P. Mishra
Pranav Diesh
Res. Counsel
Vikramjit Banerjee
Prasanna Prasad

Petitioner / Applicant

NITESH WADHWANI
Respondent STATE OF M.P.
Court Madhya Pradesh High Court
State

Madhya Pradesh

Date Aug 13, 2020
Order No.

M.Cr.C. No. 25945 of 2020

Citation

2020(8) TAXREPLY 3201
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

1. This is the first application under section 438 of the Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in crime no.23/2020 registered under section 132(1)(a)(i) of the Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as “GST Act”), Ss. 409, 467, 471, 120-B of the IPC by the Department of Revenue Intelligence and Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence Central Excise Office, District Indore (here-in-after referred to as the ‘Department’). 2. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner began with the arguments that the only fault of the petitioner is that he is the landlord of the premises where his tenant, who runs a factory, allegedly evaded the tax by clandestine sale of Pan Masala. The petitioner is neither a Partner of his tenant M/s Vishnu Essence nor is concerned with it in any other way. But he has been portrayed as the only responsible person for the alleged crimes committed by his tenant, while no documents have been produced by the d....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
30
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)