Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

SHRI DEVROOP GUHA vs. SIGNATURE GLOBAL (INDIA) PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Dec 9, 2020)

1. The present Report dated 28.02.2020 has been received from Applicant No. 2, i.e. the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation in line with Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that Applicant No. 1 had filed an application under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of the supply of purchase of Flat No. 7-405 in Tower 7 in Respondent&rsq...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHRI RAVI CHARAYA AND OTHERS vs. HARDCASTLE RESTAURANTS PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Dec 9, 2020)

1. A Report dated 15.06.2018 was received from the Applicant No. 5 i.e. the Director General of Safeguards (DGSG), now re-designated as Director General of Anti-Profiteering (hereinafter referred to as the DGAP) under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case were that the Applicants No. 1 & 2 through their e-mails both dated 23.11.2017 and Applicants No. 3 & 4 vide their e-mails dated 15.11.2017 and 17.11.2017 respectively ha...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S SK TRADING COMPANY vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER


(Allahabad High Court | Dec 9, 2020)

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Amit Manohar, learned counsel for the respondents. The following relief has been sought by means of this writ petition :- "(A). Issue writ, order or direction in nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent No. 2 - Assistant Commissioner, Mobile Squad-10, Kanpur to release of goods and truck detained vide detention order 07.11.2020 passed in Form GST MOV 06 in favour of the petitioner after getting the tax and penalty in cash/bank g...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
L. Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice (Oral) The petitioner is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its Corporate and Head Office at Kolkata in the State of West Bengal. 2. It is averred in the writ petition that the petitioner- Company has entered into a contract with GMR Bajoli Holi Hydropower Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred as “GMR”) to supply the hydro mechanical plant and equipment complete including mandatory spare and mandatory tools and tackles co...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
These writ petitions have been filed challenging the assessment orders, all dated 31.10.2020, passed by the respondent for the assessment years 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20. 2. Heard Mr.S.Karunakar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.J.Padmavathi Devi, learned Special Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. By consent of both parties, these writ petitions are taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 4. The petitioner has ch...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KANODIA OIL MILLS vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


(Delhi High Court | Dec 8, 2020)

The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing. 1. This writ petition has been preferred for the following prayers: “a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction of like nature to the Respondents, directing the Respondent to accept and process the refund application of ₹ 10,76,690/- of the Petitioner. b) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction of like nature to the Respondents, directing the Responde...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of detention and Ext.P1(a) notice issued to him in Form GST MOV 7 detaining a consignment of beverages that was being transported at his instance. In the writ petition it is the case of the petitioner that Exts.P1 and P1(a) cite classification disputes as the reason for detention. It is pointed out that it has been settled through a series of judgments of this Court that classification disputes cannot be a reason for detaining...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. HP TOURISM DEVELOPMENT BOARD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Himachal Pradesh | Dec 7, 2020)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT 2017 AND UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF HIMACHAL PRADESH GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT. 2017 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Himachal Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by M/s HP Tourism Department Board, Shimla regarding taxability in respect of receipts being Grant in Aid (in the form of license fee), donations etc received from the Government of Himachal Pradesh f...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has filed this petition impugning the order dated 10.12.2018 in No.ACCT/LGSTO-066/ASMT/ 2018-19 - an assessment order under Sections 62, 50 and 73[9] of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [for short ‘the Act’] - and the subsequent order dated 02.12.2019 in the petitioner’s appeal in No.GST.AP.24/19-20 under Section 107 of the Act calling in question the order dated 10.12.2018 in No.ACCT/LGSTO-066/ASMT/ 2018-19. The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Ta...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner, a tax payer under the CGST and SGST Act 2017 who has been issued a TIN Number, a registered works contractor under the KVAT Act prior to the introduction of GST in July 2017, through the instant writ petition has approached this Court for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to accept the request for access to GST portal enabling the petitioner to upload return for the periods from the implementation of GST with a further direction to the resp...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)