Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

M/S GM POWERTECH AND OTHERS vs. STATE OF H.P. & OTHERS


(Himachal Pradesh High Court | Dec 7, 2020)

Sureshwar Thakur, J (oral) The order(s) of assessment made by the assessing authority, and, appertaining to GST levies, stand respectively embodied in Annexure(s) P-6 and P-7. However, the afore orders of assessment of GST, are, assailed through the instant petition. 2. After hearing the learned counsel for the contesting litigants, it visibly appears that the recoursing by the writ petitioner, of, the extant remedy, is a gross mis-recoursing, as, Section 107 of the Himachal Pradesh G...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has prayed for following relief(s): “1(a) For issuance of a writ or order or direction in the nature of mandamus upon the respondents to grant one opportunity to the petitioner to rectify the inadvertent human error having taken place in filling up the declaration from TRAN-1 filed under section 140 of the Central Goods And service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) by the petitioner; (b) For further issuance of a writ or order or directi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The instructions are taken on record. The present petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "I. Issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 05.08.2020 passed by the respondent no.2 in Appeal No. KNP3/GST/055/2020 Assessment Year 2019-20 under the provisions of section 130 of U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act in relation to the goods. II. Issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari qu...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ROBO SILICON PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Dec 4, 2020)

Sub:- C.T. Department Authority for clarification and Advance Rulings – Certain clarification sought by M/s. Robo Silicon Private Limited, Banjarahills, Hyderabad – Application withdrawn - Regarding. In the reference 1st cited, M/s. Robo Silicon Private Limited, has sought certain clarification by filing an application for Advance Ruling. Through the reference 2nd cited, Assistant Commissioner (ST), Srinagar Colony Circle, was requested to go through the attachment and inform ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This writ petition has been filed directing the respondents to refund an amount of ₹ 1,11,254/- claimed by the petitioner vide shipping bill No.773482 on 21.09.2018 along with applicable interest within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he had filed the above mentioned shipping bill for the export of 740 cartons of garments to West Midlands, United Kingdom. The total value of the consignment is USD 1,61,649.98 as per the commercial invoice ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo under cover of email dated 04.12.2020 upon instructions from the petitioner reading thus, ‘1.The Petitioner filed the Form GST TRAN-1 on 27.12.2017 declaring carried forward credit of ₹ 82,91,19,712/- in terms of Section 140(1) and (3) of the CGST Act, 2017. 2.The Petitioner filed periodical return in Form GSTR 3B for the period July 2017 to November 2017 wherein Petitioner discharged output liability of ₹ 86,96,78,402/- in...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has filed this petition impugning the order dated 19.03.2020 in No.ZP2903200301303 [Annexure- A] and for other consequential reliefs. 2. Sri. G. Shivadass, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is constrained to approach this Court invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling in question the order dated 19.03.2020 though amenable to appellate jurisdiction for the following two reasons: [a]...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

CHOLA MOTORS vs. THE ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER


(Kerala High Court | Dec 4, 2020)

The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P3 detention order and Ext.P4 notice issued to him detaining a vehicle that was being transported at his instance. On a perusal of Ext.P4 detention notice, I find that the reason for detention was that there was no valid document carried along with the vehicle while transporting it. Taking note of the said reason, I find that the detention cannot be said to be unjustified. The learned counsel for the petitioner however seeks permission...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ADITYA GUPTA vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Rajasthan High Court | Dec 4, 2020)

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regular bail in File No. DGGI/JZU/INU/GST/02/18-19 filed by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Jaipur Zonal Unit for offences under Sections 132(1), (b), (c), (f), (h), (j) and (k) read with Section 132(1)(i) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 20.6.2018. Maximum punishment that can be awar...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VRINDA ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Dec 4, 2020)

Preamble A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within thirty days from the date of communication of this ruling, or within such further time as m...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)