Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

The petitioner has filed this petition chiefly for the following reliefs: a) Issue Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent not to take any coercive action against the petitioner and direct the respondent to recalculate the due amount payable by the petitioner, stated by the respondent as per Notice No.C.No.IV/06/123/2018 BW AEII/ 2388/2020 dated 13.03.2020 and No. C.No.IV/06/123/2018 BW AE-II/3840 dated 08.07.2020 as per Annexures-B and C. b) Direct the Respondent to extend a period...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
These writ petitions have been filed challenging the impugned assessment orders dated 19.11.2019 passed under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, for the assessment years 2017-2018 and 2018-2019. 2. Since the issue involved in both the writ petitions are one and the same, they are disposed of by a common order. 3. Heard Mr. S. Karunakar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. J. Padmavathi Devil, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondent. 4. The case ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GOPINATH DOMBLA, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEE.. vs. NAVKAR ASSOCIATES


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Dec 10, 2020)

1. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 2 (here-in-after referred to as the DGAP) vide his Report dated 07.06.2019, furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had conducted an investigation on the complaint of the Applicant No. 1 and found that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of additional Input tax Credit (ITC) to the above Applicant who had purchased Flat in his Proje...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 2 (here-in-after referred to as the DGAP) vide his Report dated 02.04.2019, furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had conducted an investigation on the complaint of the Applicant No. 1 and found that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of additional Input tax Credit (ITC) to the above Applicant who had purchased a Flat in his Pro...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, CENTRAL BOA.. vs. HUNGRY EYES


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Dec 10, 2020)

1. The present Report dated 29.01.2020 has been furnished by the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that a reference was received by the DGAP from the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering on 02.05.2019 recommending a detailed investigation in respect of an application alleging profiteering in respect of restaurant service supplied by the Respondent (Franchisee of M/s Su...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHRI JOTBIR SINGH BHALLA vs. SUNCITY PROJECTS PVT. LTD


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Dec 10, 2020)

1. The present Report dated 23.03.2020 has been furnished by the Director General of Anti Profiteering (here-in-after referred to as the DGAP) under Rule 126 of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules (CGST) 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the DGAP had received a reference from the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering on 28.06.2019 to conduct a detailed investigation in respect of a complaint filed by Applicant No. 1 before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, stating there...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHIV SHAKTI TEXTILES vs. STATE OF GUJARAT & OTHER


(Gujarat High Court | Dec 10, 2020)

1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs; “(A) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside impugned classification notice dated 28.11.2020 (annexed at Annexure-A) (B) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or writ in the natu...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VIMAL YASHWANTGIRI GOSWAMI vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Dec 10, 2020)

By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs : “(a) To issue a Writ of Mandamus and/or Writ of Certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing and setting aside an order dated 25/02/2020 passed by the respondent no.3 for cancellation of registration at Annexure-A to this petition. (b) To issue a Writ of Mandamus and/or Writ of Certiorari and/or any other appropriate wri...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This writ petition has been filed challenging the Order in Appeal, dated 20.08.2020 passed by the first respondent, confirming the order, dated 27.03.2019 passed by the second respondent, rejecting the petitioner's application for refund under the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. 2. Heard Mr.Derrick Sam, learned counsel representing Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Aravindan, learned Senior Panel counsel for the respondents. 3. The...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

IDRISH YUSUFBHAI MALVASI vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Dec 10, 2020)

RULE. Mr. Pranav Trivedi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent State. 1. This application has been filed under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for regular bail in connection with the order dated 29.10.2020 passed by the respondent No.2, Superintendent (Prev.), Central GST & C. Excise, Vadodara-II in File No. GEXCOM/AE/INV/GST/559/2020 for offences punishable under sections 132(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Se...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)