Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P2 order of detention and Ext.P3 notice issued to him in Form GST MOV-7 in connection with the detention of a consignment of goods that was being transported at his instance. On a perusal of Ext.P2 order, it is seen that the reason for detention was that the route described in the e-way bill did not match with the route by which the goods were actually being transported. It is therefore that the stand of the respondent that the transpo...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PRASU LNFRABUILD PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | Dec 14, 2020)

1. M/s Prasulnfrabuild Private Limited, GH-OB, Sector-16B, Greater Noida (West), Gautam Budh Nagar-201308 (hereinafter referred to as the applicant) is a registered assessee under GST having GSTN: 09AAGCP9220N1ZW. 2. The applicant is engaged in Real estate activities with own or leased property, including buying, selling, renting and operating of self-owned or leased real estate such as apartment building and dwellings, non-residential buildings, developing and subdividing real estate int...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
We have heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that similar writ petition, i.e. Obelisk Composite Technology LLP Vs. Union of India & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18392/2019) has been disposed of by Co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat at Jodhpur vide order dated 12.12.2019. Hence, present petition was liable to be disposed of in terms of the order passed in Obelisk Composite Technology LLP (supra...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 14.09.2020, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 07.04.2020, passed by the respondent no. 2, has been rejected as well as the order dated 07.04.2020 whereby the application for refund has been rejected by the respondent no. 2. As the tribunal envisaged in the GST Act has not been constituted, the petitioner has approached this court as the petitioner cannot be left remediless. That facts...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present Report dated 27.12.2019 had been received from the Applicant No. 2, i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that an application was filed by the Applicant No. 1 with the Maharashtra State Screening Committee on Antiprofiteering alleging profiteering in respect of restaurant service supplied by the Respondent despite the reduct...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 2 (here-in-after referred to as the DGAP) vide his Report dated 24.12.2019, furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had conducted an investigation on the complaint of the Applicant No. 1 and found that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of additional Input tax Credit (ITC) to the above Applicant as well as other home buyers as per...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 2 (here-in-after referred to as the DGAP) vide his Report dated 30.08.2018, furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had conducted an investigation on the complaint of the Applicant No. 1 and found that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax of IGST to his recipients on the purchase of two items "La...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 2 (here-in-after referred to as the DGAP) vide his Report dated 28.11.2018, furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had conducted an investigation on the complaint of the Applicant No. 1 and found that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of input tax credit (ITC) in respect of the flat No. 704, Building-2, Lodha Eternis, Andheri Ea...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

I.P SAJI, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, I.. vs. INOX LEISURE PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Dec 11, 2020)

The present Report dated 31.01.2020 has been received from the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation conducted under Rule 129 of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that a reference was received from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering from Applicant No. 1, alleging profiteering in respect of the supply of restaurant service despite a reduction in the rate of GST from 18% to 5% w.e.f. 15.11.2017....
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SURYA PRAKASH LOONKER AND OTHERS vs. EXCEL RASAYAN PVT. LTD


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Dec 11, 2020)

1. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 2 (here-in-after referred to as the DGAP) vide his Report dated 04.09.2018, furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had conducted an investigation on the complaint of the Applicant No. 1 and found that the Respondent had not passed on to his recipients, the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax of GST w.e.f. 15.11.2017 from 28% to 18% in ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)