Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

M/S. WORK GROUP SUSHIKSHIT BEROJGAR NAGRIK SEWA SA..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Dec 15, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. WORK GROUP SUSHIKSHIT BEROJGAR NAGRIK SEWA SAHKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT AMRAVATI., the applicant, seeking an advan...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. JANKI SUSHIKSHIT BEROJGAR NAGRIK SEVA SAHAKAR..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Dec 15, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by JANKI SUSHIKSHIT BEROJGAR NAGRIK SEVA SAHAKARI SANSTHA MA AMRAVATI, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in res...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ROYAL CARBON BLACK PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Dec 15, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by ROYAL CARBON BLACK PRIVATE LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions....
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TATA MOTORS LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Dec 15, 2020)

Read: 1) Advance Ruling order no. GST-ARA-23/2019-20/B-46 Mumbai, dated 25.08.2020 passed under Sections 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, in case of M/s. Tata Motors Limited, holder of GSTIN number 27AAACT272701ZW. 2) Application received from the aforesaid applicant dated 11.09.2020. Heard: None. CORRIGENDUM 1. In the case of the applicant, M/s. Tata Motors Limited, holder of GSTIN Number 27AAAC...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SUNDHARAMS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Dec 15, 2020)

Read:  1) Advance Ruling order no. GST-ARA-36/2019-20/B-41 Mumbai, dated 18.03.2020 passed under Sections 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, in case of M/s. Sundharams Private Limited, holder of GSTIN number 27AAACS4949P1ZN. 2) Application received from the aforesaid applicant dated 19.10.2020. Heard: None. CORRIGENDUM 1. In the case of the applicant, M/s. Sundharams Private Limited, holder of...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AMOGH RAMESH BHATAWADEKAR


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Dec 15, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. AMOGH RAMESH BHATAWADEKAR, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following quest...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. RULE. Mr. Soni, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent- State of Gujarat. 2. The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the applicant for regular bail in connection with File No. DCST/ENF/ACST-4/Hiten Mandaliya/ Arrest/2019-20/B-2 dated 6.12.2019 of the office of the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Gujarat State, Vadodara for the offences under Sections 132(1)(b)(c)(i) and 132(2...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AWADKRUPA PLASTOMECH PVT. LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Dec 15, 2020)

1. By this writ application under Article226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:- (A) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ, orders or directions to the respondent authorities to immediately sanction the refund of IGST paid in regard to the goods exported i.e. 'Zero Rated Supplies' made vide shipping bills mentioned hereinabove; (B) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be p...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioners before this Court, who are engaged in the trading business of “Arecanut”, have filed this present petition stating that they have received summons from Directorate General of GST Intelligence under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for appearance on 23/11/2020. The petitioners have further stated that they are desirous and duty bound to join investigation and render full cooperation and assistance in the ongoing investigations. However,...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KISHORE KUMAR AGRAWAL vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Orissa High Court | Dec 15, 2020)

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner by Video Conferencing mode. 2. The petitioner by way of this writ petition has challenged the letter dated 19.02.2020 (Annexure-2) issued by opposite party no.5-Superintendent, Central Excise & GST, Bhawanipatna Range, Bhawanipatna regarding interest liability under Section 50(1) read with Section 75 (12) and 79 of CGST Act, 2017. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the direction in the last paragraph of the impugned letter f...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)