Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

M/S SUPER SPINTEX PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Dec 16, 2020)

1. By this writ-application under Article226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicants have prayed for the following reliefs:- (a) That this Honorable Court be pleased to quash and set aside Notification no.26/2017Custom, dated 29.06.2017 annexed as 'Annexure G' to the extent amending Notification no.16/2015Customs, dated 01.04.2015, annexed as 'Annexure – B'; and (b) That this Honorable Court be pleased to quash and set aside Trade Notice 11/2018, dated ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PRATHU OMAR vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER


(Allahabad High Court | Dec 16, 2020)

Hon'ble Samit Gopal, J. Heard Sri Durgesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Dileep Chandra Mathur, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and Sri Gaurav Pratap Singh, learned brief holder for the State. The present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant Prathu Omar with the following prayers:- "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this application and direct ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This Review Petition has been filed by the State seeking to review the judgment dated 02.11.2020 in W.P(C).No.23397 of 2020. By the said judgment, which considered the legality of the detention of a consignment of goods at Muthanga, Wynad, during the course of interstate transportation, this Court had, taking note of the fact that the consignment was not covered by a valid delivery chalan that was one of the prescribed documents for transportation of exempted goods, found that the detention w...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RITESH SURENDRAKUMAR SHAH vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Dec 16, 2020)

1. This application has been preferred under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking anticipatory bail in connection with CBIC-DIN-202008DWW400004H92FF dated 06.08.2020, Summons under Section 70 of CGST Act 2017: CBIC-DIN-202008DWW400008T5815, dated 24.08.2020 for offence under Sections 67(2) of CGST Act, 2017 and GGST Act, 2017. 2. Heard Mr.Kartikkumar K. Joshi, learned advocate for the applicant and Mr. Pranav Trivedi, learned APP for the respondent State. Considering the ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The present petition has been filed alleging that on 30th August, 2018, the respondent no. 2 passed a detention order under Section 129(1) of the U.P. GST Act. It is stated that on 4.2.2019, respondents had issued a demand notice to the petitioner directing the petitioner to deposit a sum of ₹ 21,10,032/-. The petitioner claims that it is on this date that the petitioner became aware of the said demand and met the respondent requesting him to withdraw the demand notice as no demand exists a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HITECH PRINT SYSTEMS LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Dec 15, 2020)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by M/s. Hitech Print Systems Limited (hereinafter referred to as applicant), registered under the Goods & Services Tax...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HIMACHAL PRADESH TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION L..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Himachal Pradesh | Dec 15, 2020)

1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Himachal Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by M/s Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Ltd, Shimla. 2. On scrutiny of the application, it was observed that the requisite fee has not been deposited by the applicant. The direction to this effect was issued on dated 25th July, 2020 and 7th Sep, 2020. It was further decided that the date of submission of application for Advan...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PAGE INDUSTRIES LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Dec 15, 2020)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CGST ACT, 2017 & UNDER 98(4) OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 1. M/s. Page Industries Limited, Cessna Business Park, Tower- 1,3rd Floor, Umiya Business Bay, Kadubeesanahalli Village, VarthurHobli, Sarjapur Marathahalli Outer Ring Road, Bengaluru-560103 (hereinafter called “the applicant”) having GSTIN number 29AABCP2630DIZS, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of the CGST Rules, 2017 and S...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. ALFA GRANITES


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Dec 15, 2020)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CGST TAX ACT, 2017 & UNDER 98(4) OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 1. M/s Alfa Granites (called as the 'Applicant' hereinafter), # 145, 2nd Floor, Kodihalli, Old Airport Road, HAL 2nd Stage P.O., Next to Victor Mansion Building, Bengaluru - 560 008, Karnataka, having GSTIN number 29AAVFA7448M1ZG, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act,2017 & KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, i...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PRETTL AUTOMOTIVE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Dec 15, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by M/s. Prettl Automotive India Private Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following que...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)