Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

Petitioner, in CWJC No. 2015 of 2020, has prayed for the following relief(s):- "For issuance of an appropriate Writ/Order or Direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the order of assessment dated 28/8/2019 passed by respondent no. 4 in connection with reference no. 98, dated 28/8/2019 under sections 62 of GST Act, in respect of the petitioner namely M/s Balwant Construction Pvt. Ltd. Pursuant to a best judgment assessment when the petitioner defaulted in filing return for the t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant - a Propitiatory concern through its proprietor has prayed for the following reliefs: "(A) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned detention order dated 29.11.2020 (annexed at Annexure A) passed under Section 129(1) of the GST Acts as bein...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S SUBH INTERIORS vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Dec 18, 2020)

1. We have heard Mr. Hardik Vora, the learned counsel appearing for the writ applicant. 2. Let Notice be issued to the respondents, returnable on 24.02.2021. As the constitutional validity of sub-section (4) of the Section 16 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Acts, 2017 has been challenged on the ground of being arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 300A respectively of the Constitution of India, Notice shall also be issued to the Attorney Gener...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Shri Kavin Gulati, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Prashant Shukla and Ankur Sehgal, learned Advocates for the petitioner; Shri Shashi Nandan, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Udayan Nandan and Shri Ajay Sondhi, learned Advocates for the respondent no. 6 and Shri Rajnish Kumar Rai, learned Advocate for the respondent nos. 1 to 5 (Railways). The petitioner herein is a company registered under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act having its registered office at ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner herein has filed the present Criminal petition seeking for grant of regular bail. He is the sole accused in F.No. INV/DGGI HZU/GST/Gr ‘H’/42/2020-21 dated 02.11.2020. The offence alleged against him is under Section 132 (1) (i) read with Section 132 (1)(h)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘CGST Act’). 2. Heard Sri T. Bala Mohan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri P. Dharmesh, learned Special Public Prosecut...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Petitioner, a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, was registered under the erstwhile Central Excise Act, 1944 and Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. 2. With the advent of Goods and Service Tax regime (GST), obtained registration under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 as well as under the Kerala State Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 had been filing returns. For carrying on the activity, was entitled to a transition 'unutilised input tax credit' in its CE...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

INDER PARTAP SINGH vs. STATE OF HARYANA


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Dec 17, 2020)

The petitioner being the sole proprietor of M/s Shri Balaji Wooltex is sought to be prosecuted by the State under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 259 and 120-B IPC on account of his firm having wrongly adjudged input tax credit resulting in loss of tax to the Government exchequer to the extent of ₹ 2.24 crores (approximately). After his arrest in the afore-referred matter, the petitioner filed an application before the Trial Court seeking regular bail which was allowed by the Trial Co...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, which is a sole proprietorship firm, has challenged fundamentally two orders being the order dated 15.11.2018 [Annnexure-4 to the writ petition] and the decision contained in the communication dated 17.12.2019 [Annexure-6 to the writ petition]. In addition, it has been urged by the petitioner that the defects/errors manifest in the showcause notice dated 10.10.2018 [Annexure-2 to the writ petition]...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S METENERE LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER


(Allahabad High Court | Dec 17, 2020)

ORDER 1. Heard Sri A.P. Mathur, counsel for the petitioner, Sri B.K.S. Raghuvansi, counsel for the respondents and perused the record. 2. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition challenging the order passed by the Additional Commissioner GST, Gautam Buddh Nagar being the order dated 27.1.2020 as well as the Appellate Order dated 15.1.2020, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed. As the Tribunal as provided for under the GST Act has not been constituted an...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 24.1.2019 passed by the respondent no. 3, whereby a tax demand of ₹ 91,450/- and interest thereon has been passed as per GST DRC-07 as well as the order dated 27.7.2020 passed by the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of the GST Act, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed on the grounds of limitation. The petitioner claims to b...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)